What's the difference between "afraid of + verb" and "afraid to + verb"?
Isn't "afraid of" used more for generalisations and "afraid to" for a particular situation? For example:
She's afraid of touching spiders.
She's afraid to touch the spider.
What's the difference between "afraid of + verb" and "afraid to + verb"?
Isn't "afraid of" used more for generalisations and "afraid to" for a particular situation? For example:
She's afraid of touching spiders.
She's afraid to touch the spider.
As McCawley 1998 puts it (p.126)
Roughly speaking,
• that-complements [tensed clauses] correspond to propositions
• for-to complements [infinitives] correspond to situation types
• 's-ing complements [gerunds] correspond to events
Afraid is a psych predicate adjective (formed from the same root as fear and fright) that takes the experiencer of an emotion as its subject, and a prepositional phrase denoting the source of the fear.
The prepositional phrase must have a noun phrase as its object.
Gerunds (but not infinitives) may appear as noun phrase objects of prepositions.
Afraid, however, can also take a direct infinitive complement, but without a preposition.
The difference between the gerund and the infinitive constructions with afraid (and most similar predicates) -- to the extent there is any, which isn't much -- is that, using McCawley's "rough" terminology, the infinitive may refer to fear by the subject of the results of the action (a situation type), while the gerund can refer to a fear that the subject may perform the action anyway (an event).
But most likely this kind of distinction amounts to very, very fine-scale tuning for most English speakers, and in the right contexts, infinitive and gerund could be turned around with no ill effects.
With some verbs, there is certainly a distinct difference.
She is afraid of taking the path that leads through the crocodile-infested swamp
would usually be taken as meaning 'She is very worried that she might accidentally choose the dangerous route'.
She is afraid to take the path that leads through the crocodile-infested swamp
means 'She doesn't want to venture that way'.
Afraid to V means anxious, perhaps cripplingly so, about a certain choice. So you wouldn't say 'I'm afraid to slip on a banana skin.'
Afraid of Ving might mean the same, but means 'afraid that N might happen by chance' if that reading is possible. 'Afraid of slipping' means 'afraid that a slip might well occur'. But 'afraid of flying' doesn't have the 'happen by chance' reading available.
There is little difference between the two.
The form is: "afraid of + noun/gerund" and "afraid to + verb".
Also, there is no such generalisation. You may use either of them as per your choice.
The difference in the meaning of the two sentences has nothing to do with any distinction in the phrases afraid of and afraid to themselves. Instead, the difference results from using the generic noun spiders in the first sentence and using the definite article the (spider) in the second.
So, both "She's afraid of touching spiders" and "She's afraid to touch spiders" are generalisations about her fear of spiders. And both "She's afraid of touching the spider" and "She's afraid to touch the spider" refer to her fear of touching a particular spider.
"AFRAID OF"
This is use before a noun or an object, pronoun (her me him us them it)
"AFRAID TO"
This is use before a verb in its base form.