23

A colleague and I have a difference of opinion. I believe our department should be abbreviated as "L&D." She believes it should be "L & D," which just looks silly to me. I never see spaces used before and after an ampersand when the term is an abbreviation (two distinct words, yes, but an abbreviation, no), but I haven't been able to find a rule pertaining to this particular issue. Is there one?

RegDwigнt
  • 97,231
Jennifer
  • 231

4 Answers4

43

In the case of "acronyms" such as R&D the spaces would normally be omitted, but where the surrounding elements are words (for example, Tate & Lyle), spaces are invariably present.

Here's a link to Marks and Spencer's small print, where they refer to themselves as both M&S and Marks & Spencer on the same web page.

Just to clarify a point arising in comments elsewhere, in the title of a guide to HTML & XHTML the spaces are expected - although both surrounding elements are acronyms in themselves, they do not form a new single acronym when conjoined with an ampersand.

Also note that although at least some style guides (incl. Chicago Manual of Style) explicitly rule against spaces in acronyms, as @nohat points out, they are only style guides - there is no absolute rule in play unless your commissioning editor requires adherence to such. For example, in the UK, hospital Accident and Emergency departments are invariably A & E (with spaces).

FumbleFingers
  • 140,184
  • 45
  • 294
  • 517
9

No spaces is most often used, and supported by style guides, except in special cases. For those who have access to CMOS online, here's a link to the section advocating this:

10.10: No space is left on either side of an ampersand used within an initialism. R&D. Texas A&M.

For those who don't, search the CMOS site for "ampersand initialism" to catch a glimpse of the rule. If the Thesaurus.com style guide is worth anything, it has the same idea.

Daniel
  • 57,547
  • Definitely? Oh look here is a published book with spaces: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596003821 – z7sg Ѫ Aug 04 '11 at 17:59
  • 5
    Obviously the form HTML&XHTML would be wrong because it's not an acronym - it's two acronyms. – FumbleFingers Aug 04 '11 at 18:40
  • 1
    That is exactly what I want: to argue with Chicago, because it is a guide not an authority. ;) @Fumble has a valid point here though. – z7sg Ѫ Aug 04 '11 at 19:34
  • 6
    Just to be clear, the Chicago Manual of Style is not some kind of official authority over the English language. Some publishers and organizations insist on written works following the rules in CMOS, but that is only a rule of those organizations, not a rule of the English language. There are examples of both styles being used in professionally published works, so if you are using CMOS style, yes there is a rule, but for the English language as a whole—which is the domain of discussion on this site—there is no rule, and either form is correct. – nohat Aug 04 '11 at 23:39
  • @nohat: If you downvoted, would you consider removing the vote? I edited so that it's not definite. – Daniel Aug 05 '11 at 00:57
  • I didn't downvote, but - edit notwithstanding - I'm not really sure the concept of "correct" is appropriate in this particular case. Style guides are partly about consistency of style within one or a range of publications, and I think in this case that's about all it comes down to. – FumbleFingers Aug 05 '11 at 01:12
  • Removed "correctness". Not that it matters much - I upvoted you, already - but since I already have 4 score, I might as well fix my answer as delete it. – Daniel Aug 05 '11 at 02:08
  • @Fumble: Was that you who just upvoted? Someone's being nice to me... – Daniel Aug 05 '11 at 02:11
  • @drm65: Actually no - but you've successfully gotten me to look at your answer following the last edit, and I have just upvoted it. I still can't fully endorse using the word "rule" three times in respect of what's really just a stylistic preference, but I do quite like the advice for catch a glimpse of the [CMOS] rule. :) – FumbleFingers Aug 05 '11 at 03:20
6

Yes, "acronyms"/initialisms have no space. When the ampersand is used inline the spaces are present.

Bear in mind, the ampersand is a highly stylised rendering of the Latin "et" which means "and" (perhaps a scribal shortening). I have no doubt that once it was pronounced "et" rather than current "and". So inline it is a word, in acronyms, a symbol.

Swizzlr
  • 409
0

I share the same opinion with you Jennifer and the answers before me but I have another point which has nothing to do with English rules.

Logically, we use abbreviations or initials to minimize writing more letters. So, what is the point of adding new spaces before and after an ampersand? However, in case of full words we normally add spaces because the purpose of clarifying.

My argument is purely based on logic so I didn't take the effort to support it.

Jamie
  • 423