20

To me, using Present Perfect form means the event can occur again. So, saying

someone has died

may not be grammatically correct.

Also, I noticed (it might be just coincidence):

passed away

is used more often than

has passed away

Is using Present Perfect correct here?

1 Answers1

43

The Present Perfect Construction in English has the following uses (cf. McCawley 1971):

  • (a) The Universal sense of the Perfect, used to indicate that a state of affairs prevailed throughout some interval stretching from the past into the present
    I've known Max since 1960.

  • (b) The Existential sense of the Perfect, used to indicate the existence of past events,
    I have read Principia Mathematica five times.

  • (c) The Stative/Resultative sense of the Perfect,
    used to indicate that the direct effect of a past event still continues
    I can't come to your party tonight - I've caught the flu.

  • (d) The Hot News sense of the Perfect, used to report hot news
    Malcolm X has just been assassinated.

This, coupled with the prohibition on the use of Present Perfect with subjects who are dead

  • Madonna has visited Chicago.
  • *Einstein has visited Chicago.

means that X has died is only appropriate in a context in which
the speaker believes that the addressee would not yet know that X is dead.

Executive Summary: If it's Hot News, use the Present Perfect; but if it's Old News, simple past.


McCawley, James D. 1971. Tense and time reference in English.
In C. Fillmore and T. Langendoen (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics
New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp 96-113.

John Lawler
  • 107,887
  • 1
    +1 for detailed explanation. Your answer kind of confirms what other people said in their comments but provides better reasoning – Igor Turman Apr 04 '12 at 23:21
  • 3
    +1 for a nice summary of Present Perfect usage. After all, who knows how long it will be around, given that 'the term "Future Perfect" has been abandoned since it was discovered not to be' (Douglas Adams)? – Amos M. Carpenter Apr 05 '12 at 03:42
  • 2
    Some people say if you analyse a beautiful piece of nature or art you somehow reduce it, but I'm not one of them. I love seeing the bare bones of something I "know" about language usage (but can't fully articulate) laid bare so clearly. I look forward to closing an endless stream of related future questions in favour of this one! – FumbleFingers Apr 05 '12 at 12:21
  • It doesn't really matter what comes before the have, or what tense it is (Present and Perfect are on offer today). These are the semantic properties of the *Perfect Construction*, which is one of the parts of the Verb Phrase. If one learns to look for Constructions instead of spurious "tenses", it's easy enough to see the bones and sinews. – John Lawler Apr 05 '12 at 14:08
  • 3
    @JohnLawler, How about "All the great thinkers of our time, including Einstein, have visited Princeton"? The example is from Declerck, Reed, and Cappelle 2006. – Alex B. May 30 '12 at 22:30
  • 2
    First approximations only in answers to questions like this. Sentences like those are the kind that keep syntacticians awake. – John Lawler May 30 '12 at 22:32