14

In an "interesting" thread of comments we began to look at the word fuck in several different uses. Most of them were interjections and verb uses as would be expected.

But, perhaps dialectally, the word can easily be used as a noun, and even an adjective.

I would like to see how many different parts of speech can the word fuck be used as in its unmodified form. (i.e. no fucking, fucked, etc.). Pluralization of noun or conjugation to fucks is the only acceptable variant.

The answer must provide real-world examples (i.e. no mere cramming of the word into a sentence and claiming it's an adverb!) And, I will even accept different verb types, adjectives, nouns, etc. (e.g. If you can find a grammatical way to use it as a helper verb, my hat is off to you.)

If you wish to get extra credit, then you can answer with some of the variants above, but only after you have made an answer per the above rules.

The winner should have both the most varied and interesting answers!

Just to make it clear, this is a word-game, and as such will be a bit broad or POB.

Helmar
  • 5,437
David M
  • 22,515
  • 3
    How many parts of speech do you think there are? You may find a range of opinions in ELU. – bib Mar 05 '14 at 20:53
  • @bib I'm not here to decide that. If you can show a distinct use and provide citations, that's worth extra to my mind. – David M Mar 05 '14 at 20:57
  • As I mentioned to Joe, it's also problematic for this question that nouns can behave as modifiers, so there's really no way to make an “adjective” from fuck; a noun modifying another noun is a noun adjunct rather than an adjective. You might think that's being fussy about definitions, but then definitions are at the heart of this puzzle. It'll be tough to come up with an answer that actually satisfies linguists and not just popular opinion. – Bradd Szonye Mar 05 '14 at 21:43
  • 3
    As many as you got. How many is that? – John Lawler Mar 05 '14 at 21:46
  • And sorry if it seems that I'm being unnecessarily fussy or pedantic. I think it's an interesting question, just dangerously close to being primarily opinion based. – Bradd Szonye Mar 05 '14 at 22:05
  • @BraddSzonye it is tagged word-game. I had the same thought, but figured a word-game had a wider latitude. – David M Mar 05 '14 at 22:06
  • @BraddSzonye The no suffix rule is arbitrary. I did it to make the game harder! – David M Mar 05 '14 at 22:13
  • 4
    Is it just in Australia that we have our own version of the Buffalo sentence? [Fck fcking fcked fcker fcking fckups fck fcking fcked fcking fckup fcking fcker's fck] (http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Fuck_fucking_fucked_fucker_fucking_fuckups_fuck_fucking_fucked_fucking_fuckup_fucking_fucker%27s_fuck) means 'Gosh that very unpleasant drunk man who is frequently scammed by very incompetent people just ruined that incompetent copulating man's act of the horizontal tango'. – long Mar 05 '14 at 22:30
  • What part of speech is fuck in sweet fuck all? – Bradd Szonye Mar 05 '14 at 22:31
  • @BraddSzonye Or how about Like fuck I will! Is that the rare adverbial usage? Or is it a noun phrase? – David M Mar 05 '14 at 22:39
  • @long, or the more succinct: Fck the fcking f*ckers! – Kristina Lopez Mar 05 '14 at 22:42
  • I'm pretty sure that the answer is every part except articles and conjunctions. Hmm, not sure about prepositions ... – RBarryYoung Mar 06 '14 at 00:08
  • @RBarryYoung I got a conjunction, stretching the term a bit, but still. – terdon Mar 06 '14 at 00:21
  • 4
    I really think that using f*ck on this post is stretching reasonable propriety to its breaking point. The whole post is about fuck and its linguistic versatility, I think we should be allowed to write it. At the very least, it makes absurdly incomprehensible sentences like @long's example a bit easier to parse. – terdon Mar 06 '14 at 02:37
  • 20 or 30 years ago there was a tongue-in-cheek "scholarly" presentation (audio) played on the local radio station, giving examples of all the ways you could use this word. Of course, the actual word was bleeped out each time. See also Army Creole. – Phil Perry Mar 06 '14 at 14:16
  • @PhilPerry it's likely the version linked to by Kristina below. – David M Mar 06 '14 at 14:20
  • 3
    This page, with all comments expanded, has 117 instances of "fuck" – Cruncher Mar 06 '14 at 14:55
  • 1
    answer by video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_PkJ_4oEjc – Kiwy Jul 18 '14 at 10:40

6 Answers6

21
  • Noun: "Like fuck you will!."
    • Also, since this is contested: Hard as fuck or Yes, thank you, I'd love a fuck.
  • Pronoun: "I hit fuck-face over there with a baseball bat." (both cheating and plagiarizing @Joe but you said nothing about hyphenated forms)
  • Adjective: "He's fucked!"
  • Verb: "I love to fuck while eating duck."
  • Adverb: "It was fuck hard", yes, apparently it is used by some.
  • Conjunction: "I went swimming, fuck the cold." (as in, I went swimming despite the cold.)
  • Preposition: don't think it's possible.
  • Interjection: "Fuck! I was sure I could find a preposition!"

Extra brownie points (abandoning all pretense at seriousness):

  • Auxiliary verb:

    • progressive aspect : He fucking sleeping dude!
    • epistemic modality : Wikipedia's example of How dare you! could be expressed in a single Fuck!.
terdon
  • 21,559
  • 3
    That's not a conjunction, just an interjection. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Mar 05 '14 at 22:14
  • Hyphenated is OK. It preserves the form well enough. – David M Mar 05 '14 at 22:40
  • @JanusBahsJacquet fair enough. Will you let me get away with this one? – terdon Mar 05 '14 at 23:36
  • I'm asking from a genuine place of ignorance: isn't like fuck you will an adverbial use of a noun? Isn't like fuck modifying will? – David M Mar 05 '14 at 23:40
  • @DavidM not too sure myself. I'd consider it a noun in the same way as hell in like hell you will. I don't see why it's modifying the verb but mine is a place of considerable ignorance as well so I am open to corrections. – terdon Mar 05 '14 at 23:43
  • @terdon Hell and fuck are definitely nouns, but I think that they are part of a phrase that modifies the way you will. I did find this. – David M Mar 05 '14 at 23:47
  • @DavidM I added a couple of examples that should be clearer. – terdon Mar 05 '14 at 23:50
  • I've found "It was fucking hard" to be more common than "It was fuck hard". (And as a construction, it's used quite frequently with a variety of verbs; "You'd better fucking run!" "I'll fucking tell you when I can come up with something else." etc.) – LessPop_MoreFizz Mar 05 '14 at 23:56
  • @LessPop_MoreFizz I would never use it was fuck hard either, it sounds clumsy and non-native to my ear, that's why I linked to examples. I was not expecting to find any but some do seem to come from native speakers (though I cringe at the thought). – terdon Mar 05 '14 at 23:58
  • I would have said "fucking baseball bat." – Michael Hampton Mar 06 '14 at 00:18
  • @MichaelHampton no, fucking has been forbidden by the OP. – terdon Mar 06 '14 at 00:19
  • 1
    You know, the word pace can be a preposition when used in sentences like “Nor, pace Mr. Smith, was I for one moment defending immorality in the journalist.” It originated as the ablative singular of Latin pax meaning peace, as in pāce tuā. But I feel like fuck could move into that sort of slot pretty slickly. It would make a nice antonym to the preposition pace. – tchrist Mar 06 '14 at 02:33
  • @tchrist huh, hadn't come across that usage, thanks. So in that context it means with all due respect, not sure how well "Nor, fuck Mr. Smith" would scan. Sounds too much like a continuation of "I will not marry Mr. Jones...". – terdon Mar 06 '14 at 02:36
  • Yes, that’s right: the OED says “Used chiefly as a courteous or ironical apology for a contradiction or difference of opinion.” So the fuck Mr Smith would be the opposite of “with all due respect”. Like I have no respect for those bozos. Which is kinda what it means anyway, fuck the authorities, and people will say what they will. – tchrist Mar 06 '14 at 03:33
  • @tchrist I'd argue that it is still a verb. How is it different from Well I'm going, and fuck the headmaster? – terdon Mar 06 '14 at 03:44
  • 1
    You forgot "modal particle". As in: "Just fucking do it." – Tim Seguine Mar 06 '14 at 19:47
  • 1
    You, sir, are an artist! I declare you the winner! Please pick up your prize at the SE offices. – David M Mar 07 '14 at 13:34
  • 2
    @TimSeguine true, but I did not want to give Nike free advertising. – terdon Mar 07 '14 at 15:58
  • Sorry to piss on the parade, but I have to call you on a couple. That's not a conjunction and that's not a pronoun. Or if they are then every interjection I can think of could act like a conjunction. Likewise many nouns like a pronoun. Also, your adjective is not modifying a noun, it's a verbal past participle. Also... you can't think of 'fuck' used by itself as the plain primary verb from where this all came? We've all been entertained thoroughly; I humbly submit this in the interest of science. – Mitch Oct 19 '16 at 19:11
  • 1
    @JanusBahsJacquet that's absolutely horrible. It actually made me laugh out loud. – terdon Oct 20 '16 at 08:33
  • @Mitch Piss away! As I'm sure you know, this answer is very much tongue in cheek. Not sure I agree with your objections, mind you, but that is likely down to my own ignorance. I will object to the discrediting of my adjective though. It's modifying a noun, just like fast is in he's fast. It is a past participle but I submit that it's doing the job of an adjective there. Consider the difference between he has been fucked and he is fucked. It's as much an adjective as finished. – terdon Oct 20 '16 at 08:37
  • it would be an adjective if you could say 'the fucked man'. That doesn't work for me (though it may for you). 2) we're talking about 'fuck' not 'fucked'. You definitely can't say 'the fuck man'
  • – Mitch Oct 20 '16 at 11:52
  • @Mitch awww! Dammit! I hadn't noticed that fucked was against the rules. And I've been basking in the glow of my answer for almost two years now! Fair point about the fucked man. It doesn't work for me either, I'll need to think about that. – terdon Oct 20 '16 at 12:07
  • @Mitch I agree with you about the conjunction. But I have to disagree about the participle: a participle can be said to be both adjective and verb at once, which I think is the only sensible way to classify it. The fact that it is not used attributively in this case doesn't mean it isn't an adjective: attributive use is only one aspect of adjectives. Cf. able, which cannot be used before a noun in its most frequent sense, but which is normally classified as an adjective. – Cerberus - Reinstate Monica Oct 20 '16 at 13:51