5

In one of Oasis's songs — Cigarettes and Alcohol — there are two sentences that make me confused:

All I found was cigarettes and alcohol

...and...

All I need is cigarettes and alcohol

Why would is and was be correct in these sentences instead of are and were, since they're referring to more than one thing?

Hellion
  • 59,365
lee
  • 53
  • 1
  • 1
  • 3

2 Answers2

0

I have difficulty to find an explanation but "all" in "All I need" is felt as a singular so the verb form is "is" even when a plural follows.

I checked Google Ngram Viewer for "all I need is": a lot of examples. But none for "all I need are".

One might say the system here is as with "it". After "it" follows the singular verb form even if a plural noun follows. It + are is not possible.

  • It's my children, said Mother Goat when she saw something moving in the stomach of the sleeping Wulf.
rogermue
  • 13,878
0

The habit of "All I need is..." conflicts with more basic rules. But the basic rule for 'and' wins, if you are writing.

Unless the two things joined by 'and' constitute an inseparable group, or refer to a single composite, like "Macaroni and Cheese", the result of combining them is plural.

For some people (including, presumably the song's author) 'cigarettes and alcohol' is a composite, representing their comforting vices, but for most of us it describes two separate things.

"All I need are a map and a compass" works in any context, though some folks will find it stilted. Whereas "All I need is a map and a compass" works only with some people and at some times.

  • 1
    It's not this simple though. You need to go a further step to answer the question. You've said "map and compass" is plural, but that phrase is not the subject of the sentence. The subject of the sentence is "All I need"; you need to show that this phrase is plural to justify the use of "All I need are...". – herisson Aug 06 '17 at 20:34