How do you hyphenate the word 'branches'? I'm intrigued between branch·es and bran·ches.
- 111
1 Answers
I wouldn't.
It is only eight letters long, and is the produced plural of a word that is only six letters long, monosyllabic and from a single root, without suffix or prefix or compound parts.
As such, I'd move the entire word onto the next line, even when space was limited.
I note that Merriam Webster and Oxford Dictionaries, two dictionaries that contain hyphenation advice, both suggest that branch has no hyphenation opportunities. Branches of course only adds the -es of the plural, and one would never hyphenate at that point if at all avoidable.
If space was extremely limited, then such an unusual typographic situation would make this a matter of graphic design rather than normal typography, so the exact opposite would apply; I'd hyphenate it whichever way worked best visually with the rest of the graphic design. (In theory anyway, I'm not very skilled in such matters).
If I had a gun to my head and had to hyphenate the word as best I could, I'd probably do so as bran·ches to match the syllables and to avoid breaking on the -es, but I wouldn't be happy with it.
- 53,363
-
Merrian-Webster hyphenates punch-ing bag after the "ch". So presumably the correct hyphenation would be branch-es, which isn't a good idea since -es is only two letters. – Peter Shor May 23 '19 at 11:27
branch·esisn’t very good hyphenation practice as far as I know it, sincebranchis also a word. – Ry- Jun 10 '14 at 23:01