I see in my company mails, there is a lot of usage of the statement Due to urgent personal errands (..I may not report to office today) which, by hunch, I guess is not a proper usage.
What is the correct way to use it,if I am right?
I see in my company mails, there is a lot of usage of the statement Due to urgent personal errands (..I may not report to office today) which, by hunch, I guess is not a proper usage.
What is the correct way to use it,if I am right?
Due to urgent personal errands, I may not report to the office today.
This is a lame excuse, and it might have gotten a person fired ten years ago, but it seems there is no problem with the grammar.
Due to is used prepositionally, validated by OED under due:
The use of due to as a prepositional phrase meaning ‘because of’ (as in he had to retire due to an injury) first appeared in print in 1897, and traditional grammarians have opposed this prepositional usage for more than a century on the grounds that it is a misuse of the adjectival phrase due to in the sense of ‘attributable to, likely or expected to’ ( the train is due to arrive at 11:15), or ‘payable or owed to’ ( render unto Caesar what is due to Caesar). Nevertheless, this prepositional usage is now widespread and common in all types of literature and must be regarded as standard English. The phrase due to the fact that is very common in speech, but it is wordy, and, especially in writing, one should use instead the simple word because.
Errands is the object of the preposition, and the adjectives urgent and personal modify errands, to complete the leading prepositional phrase:
Due to urgent personal errands,
I is the subject of the sentence (apparently the person with the urgent personal errands).
May is the auxiliary of the verb report, negated by not, and modified temporally by today.
To the office is a prepositional phrase modifying report locationally, and completing the meaningful sentence:
Due to urgent personal errands, I may not report to the office today.