Could someone explain the difference in meaning between these two forms of conditional?
1.If I had time, I would be there.
2.I would have been there if I had time.
Could someone explain the difference in meaning between these two forms of conditional?
1.If I had time, I would be there.
2.I would have been there if I had time.
The first refers to the present moment, the second to a time in the past.
(in the second case "I would have been there if I had had time" would seem more common, however, referring to a specific instance; the use of the simple past in (2) implies that your not having time was a more or less continuous state rather than being specific to one event or instance)
If I knew her number I would call her. May I say: I would have called or is it the only way to use this with "If I had known"?
I am rather confused when taking this in compare with negative analogue : If I didn't love her, I wouldn't have married her.
– gerol2000 Mar 26 '15 at 14:01
Would it be correct to say: If I was afraid of spiders, I wouldn't have picked it up? – gerol2000 Mar 26 '15 at 22:42