The common definition for "insert" is: to put or place in, as in "to insert a key in a lock."
Nonetheless, particularly in technical descriptions, you can find numerous examples where "insert" is used with the preposition "over" to imply a situation where one object is placed or fitted over another object.
e.g., "The catheter is 'inserted over' the guide wire."
The phrase also appears in more common (non-technical) instances.
"Next, an empty beer box is 'inserted over' the bottles and everything is flipped over." https://www.thefastrack.ca/main/presspack/bar
Since the word "in" is embedded in the definition of "insert," these usages seem contradictory with the definition of "insert." In fact, the beer box is not being inserted over the bottles, but the bottles are being inserted into the box. Similarly, the catheter is not being inserted over the guide wire, but the guide wire is being inserted into the catheter.
On the other hand, in these examples, the "guide wire" and the "bottles" are static or passive objects. Stated otherwise, the objects that are being moved and perform the actions are the "catheter" and the "box." Thus, the phrase "insert over" seems appropriate in this sense.
I could not find any English usage guide that confirms that "insert over" is either acceptable or non-acceptable.
Does anyone know and can you point me to a source?