A verb meaning "Answering question in a way that doesn't answer it"

Question

Take an example:

Me : Where can I find the best pizza in the city?

Friend:1000s of people are dying of hunger and all you care about best pizza.

In this case he does reply to my question but it doesn't help me.

Is there a word/group of words to express this?

I don't understand your question. Did you actually mean “Answering question in a way THAT doesn't answer it” ?? — Blessed Geek, Jun 04 '15 at 08:41
Dodge/evade/etc all work as per the answers. But there is a better word or phrase related to argumentation that I can't quite think of. An example of it is with politicians in debates. They never answer the question posed to them but instead answer their own versions of the questions. — DanielST, Jun 04 '15 at 13:34
@slicedtoad - are you thinking of dissemble? (I can't be bothered to find a link to make this an answer. Plus it doesn't really answer the OP's question anyway.) — AndyT, Jun 04 '15 at 15:26
What's a word for avoiding a question with a generic (fake) answer? — ermanen, Jun 04 '15 at 16:38
What do you call a response which does not address the question? — ermanen, Jun 04 '15 at 16:39
I like bloviate, even though it applies to more than just responses to questions. — jxh, Jun 04 '15 at 22:06

score 9 · Answer 1 · 2015-06-04T13:21:34.250

9

You are probably looking for to dodge (a question):

to evade (questions, etc) by cleverness or trickery:

kept dodging the reporter's questions. (Collins Dictionary)

edited Jun 04 '15 at 13:21

answered Jun 04 '15 at 08:41

what does AHD stand for ? – 2FaceMan Jun 04 '15 at 08:45
American Heritage Dictionary, you can see that in the link I provided. – Jun 04 '15 at 08:49
1

Evade is probably better here, as 'cunning / trickery / deceit' is not involved: the responder is telling you point blank that your question shows a cavalier attitude. – Edwin Ashworth Jun 04 '15 at 12:45
I'm not sure 'dodge' or 'evade' implies than a reply was necessarily given. I think it could be used to describe situations where the person refrained from answering at all. – Tushar Raj Jun 04 '15 at 12:55
1

@TusharRaj - Well, the person replies as if asked a different question, that is what dodge and elude refer to. I think that it is probably not the best example. The title is quite clear, though. – Jun 04 '15 at 13:06
@Josh61: No no, I'm saying that dodge is right here, but it could also be right if the politician silently got in his car. In other words, it's not specific enough. Btw, agree on 'not the best example'. – Tushar Raj Jun 04 '15 at 13:08

score 6 · Answer 2 · answered Jun 04 '15 at 13:50

6

Prevaricate:

"to avoid giving a direct answer to a question in order to hide the truth" http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/learner/prevaricate

answered Jun 04 '15 at 13:50

cpsm

106

score 5 · Answer 3 · edited Jun 15 '20 at 07:40

5

Are you set on a verb?

I'd say your friend gave a nonanswer

The lack of an answer.

An answer that is so vague or noncommittal as to be worthless.

(Wiktionary)

edited Jun 15 '20 at 07:40

Community

1

answered Jun 04 '15 at 12:36

Tushar Raj

21,025

score 4 · Answer 4 · answered Jun 04 '15 at 08:50

4

I"m tempted to say Hedge or Equivocate, but I'm not sure if they're quite right...

answered Jun 04 '15 at 08:50

Squish

79

4

This is helpful, but probably better as a comment. Or you could grab a definition from an internet dictionary and add it to your post. That would mk it a proper answer! :-) – Araucaria - Him Jun 04 '15 at 15:14

score 3 · Answer 5 · answered Jun 04 '15 at 13:01

3

It could be considered a non sequitur

a statement having little or no relevance to what preceded it

Collins

answered Jun 04 '15 at 13:01

bib

72,782

The OP's example is not a non-sequitur. The nonanswer in his example is definitely related to the question even if it doesn't answer it. – ikegami Jun 04 '15 at 17:21
@ikegami I agree that most non sequiturs are totally off topic, but the answer has little ... relevance, as Collins offers. It does not follow from the question, the literal meaning of non sequitur. – bib Jun 04 '15 at 17:30

score 3 · Answer 6 · edited Jun 15 '20 at 07:40

3

The specific situation you cite:

Q: [Any question whatsoever]

A: How can you worry about that when children are starving in Africa!

is called the Fallacy of Relative Privation. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_relative_privation

There are many other ways in which a question can be answered in a manner that explains nothing though. For example, "begging the question" is answering a question in a manner that assumes the thing being asked about:

Q: Why is this diamond hard and this butter soft?

A: Because the diamond is made of hard molecules, butter is made of soft molecules.

You might have learned that stuff is made of molecules, but you have learned nothing about hardness and softness from this answer. Why are hard things hard? Because hard things are made of hard things. That is really a non-answer.

There are many different ways in which a question can be non-answered; are you looking for a term for all of them, or for some specific examples?

edited Jun 15 '20 at 07:40

Community

1

answered Jun 04 '15 at 15:17

Eric Lippert

1,503

"Why are hard things hard? Because hard things are made of hard things." Isn't this more a tautology than a begged question? – hBy2Py Jun 04 '15 at 17:29
A begged question is circular reasoning, which is itself like a tautology with more steps; an advanced tautology, if you will. A bare tautology would be "Why is [hard thing] hard? Because it's hard/high on the hardness scale/not soft." Considering the composition is taking one step towards an actual explanation; the example does this so poorly that the only added information is based on the same premise as the question, which is the formal definition of begging the question. The premise must be true for the conclusion to be true. – Patrick M Jun 04 '15 at 22:34
1

And a big +1 to relative privation fallacy. It's the only unique aspect of this question; everything else is sufficiently covered by the questions ermanem linked. – Patrick M Jun 04 '15 at 22:38

score 2 · Answer 7 · edited Jun 05 '15 at 00:06

2

Deflect the question.

This is often done in interviews or QA sessions.

edited Jun 05 '15 at 00:06

curiousdannii

5,725

answered Jun 04 '15 at 16:32

Tim

21

score 1 · Answer 8 · answered Jun 04 '15 at 12:41

1

This is an evasive response. Your friend has evaded the question.

answered Jun 04 '15 at 12:41

superluminary

587

1

In the particular example, it's almost as if his friend attacked the question. – RemcoGerlich Jun 04 '15 at 14:43

score 1 · Answer 9 · answered Jun 04 '15 at 13:22

1

My suggestion would be obfuscate : verb : to make obscure, unclear, or unintelligible.

answered Jun 04 '15 at 13:22

Peter

11

Obfuscation has nothing to do with answering. – Chenmunka Jun 04 '15 at 17:53

score 1 · Answer 10 · answered Jun 04 '15 at 21:12

1

Sidestep can also apply:

"to avoid answering or dealing with (something) directly, bypass, evade" - http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sidestep

answered Jun 04 '15 at 21:12

skchandra

11

score 0 · Answer 11 · answered Jun 04 '15 at 22:00

A flippant or flip answer is a frivolous, unhelpful answer intended to belittle the person asking and/or the question being asked. I'd personally expect to see "flip" in this context instead of "flippant" -- "flip answer" is something of a set phrase.

score 0 · Answer 12 · answered Jun 05 '15 at 00:05

In your example, not only is your friend not answering the question, he is dismissing the question as unworthy of an answer. Unlike an evasive answer or a non-sequitur, the response is meant to shut down further discussion of the topic by making you feel bad about having asked it.

A verb meaning "Answering question in a way that doesn't answer it"

12 Answers12

Linked

Related