I don't want to go to a not nice place.
I don't want to go to a place not nice.
I know that the first one is correct, and the second one is too. My question is, is whiz deletion used for the second sentence?
I don't want to go to a not nice place.
I don't want to go to a place not nice.
I know that the first one is correct, and the second one is too. My question is, is whiz deletion used for the second sentence?
The problem here is not with WHIZ, which does apply, but rather with what happens then. Does "not nice" count as a modifier of "place", which requires that it be preposed, so that it goes in the normal place for a noun modifier, or is it too complex to count as a single modifier, so that it should remain in position after "place".
Tentatively, my intuition is that there is no good solution. "Not nice" is simple enough that it cannot remain in position after the noun, yet too complex to be preposed. So there is no good way to say it.
I would say the first sentence is seriously flawed. I don't really know anybody who would say something like that in the US.
See, the so-called whiz deletion is originally used to replace who and to be but I assume you mean to say: "to a place that is not nice". so I think whiz deletion is used there but you cannot drop that is out of it otherwise it's wrong. Hope it helps:)