9

What’s the difference between these two alternatives:

  1. Are you going to England this summer?
  2. Will you go to England this summer?
tchrist
  • 134,759
Björn
  • 135

9 Answers9

8

"Are you going?" is the more natural British English usage when you are simply asking about plans or intent. "Will you go" works too, but sounds a bit clunky. "Will you...?" is also the way you might ask someone to do something, rather than just asking about their plans - as in "please go...."

Matt
  • 81
3

As a native AusEng speaker these two sentences are very similar in meaning, but I think there is a slight pragmatic difference. This answer represents my intuition as to what that difference is, and I welcome feedback on it.

I should first note that I am considering only a neutral intonation. If for example the word you was stressed (to contrast with someone else) then the difference I suggest below would no longer apply.

Are you going to England this summer?

I think this is the unmarked option. This question would be appropriate to ask in many situations:

  • you heard them say a while ago that they might and want to know if they had decided yet
  • you haven't heard them directly talk about their plans, but did hear them say something that suggests they might go
  • they regularly go to England and you're curious if they'll go this summer

Will you go to England this summer?

This is a marked sentence, as is common for sentences with will (at least in conversation or less formal registers, where going to is the dominant future marker.) I think that this sentence would be used if both of these factors were true:

  • you know that at one stage they were definitely considering going (so if you only suspected that they were planning to go it would be an inappropriate question to ask)
  • you have heard of some reason which suggests they might not be able to go (such as a sick family member or a lack of money)

But if you were asking in this way it may be more natural to add a still to the question.

curiousdannii
  • 5,725
2

English, unlike many languages, doesn't have a true future tense. We can use the present tense to indicate the future if the context makes it clear. Alternatively we can use the auxiliary verb, 'will'. Originally 'to will' meant to wish or to intend something to happen. Nowadays it can still have that sense but more often it simply indicates future events.

Are you going to England this summer? ---> Is it a fixed plan that you are going?

Will you go to England this summer? ---> Do you intend to go?

chasly - supports Monica
  • 37,215
  • 2
    Not sure I agree with your statement about 'will'. It may have a second meaning, to will something, but if I were to say "England will be sunny next week", there's no intention or desire expressed by England to become sunny. Also, you didn't mention the auxiliary 'shall' which has no secondary meaning and only ever expresses the future tense. – Seth Jeffery Aug 21 '15 at 11:06
  • @SethJeffery - That's why I said, "more often it simply indicates future events" It's arguable whether 'shall' and 'will' form a tense. An online search throws up many discussions on the subject, e.g. http://www.quora.com/Why-does-English-not-have-a-future-tense – chasly - supports Monica Aug 21 '15 at 12:06
  • @SethJeffery chasly didn't mention "shall" because the OP didn't ask about it, and it will only confuse and obfuscate the issue, and make the person answering look cool by how much they can pontificate about English grammar. – michael_timofeev Aug 21 '15 at 12:56
  • Whether English has a 'true' future tense is controversial and certainly not decided. It definitely does not have an inflected form of the future tense. To me, it seems like terminological splitting of hairs to say a future tense doesn't exist in English. – Mitch Aug 21 '15 at 13:16
  • @Mitch - It certainly has future indicators but there are many, e.g. "When are you going?" ---> I go there tomorrow ---> I'm going there tomorrow ---> I shall go there tomorrow ---> I will go there tomorrow ---> I am going to go there tomorrow. – chasly - supports Monica Aug 21 '15 at 13:21
  • @chaslyfromUK "I go there tomorrow" sounds terrible to me, like a robot or non-native speaker. What I'm saying is that English is not like Chinese, which really doesn't have a future tense at all. But of course they still communicate the future (or past). (in word for word translation: "I tomorrow go to the museum" and "I yesterday go to the museum". – Mitch Aug 21 '15 at 15:10
2

Although it was the huge bounty that drew my attention to this question (as intended by the member who placed the bounty) I am not at all sure that we can assume there is a difference in meaning between 'are you going' and 'will you go' here, simply because OP asks, "what is the difference?"

What if somebody were to ask,

What is the difference between 'twelve' and 'a dozen?'

[You could possibly split hairs and find out some profound difference between 12 and a dozen, but the only difference I can think of is almost nonsensical: a person who does not know what 12 means could still ask for and buy a dozen eggs where 'a dozen' is a standard number for packing/selling certain products.]

Same here. It seems to me that in this specific pair of examples given by OP,

Are you going to England this summer?

Will you go to England this summer?

'are you going' and 'will you go' mean the same thing. 'Will you be going', and 'do you intend to go' would also have the same meaning. Native users might well prefer one expression over another, and I am not a native speaker. But I cannot imagine that the meaning of the question changes appreciably whether you say 'are you going' or 'will you go' -- and the possible answers are all the same: yes / no / not sure / not decided / God willing. Conclusion: semantically there is no difference.

Note: I appreciate the logic of the subtle distinction made by some other answers here that "are you going to" refers to a pre-planned activity and really means "are you going through with the pre-planned action" whereas "will you (go)" is a more open-ended question simply asking "are you likely to do something in the future" -- but this is possibly not a clear-cut distinction because not all speakers might mean the same thing; so such a statement needs to be interpreted in context.

However the Google Ngrams comparison I did, as advised by a senior member, suggests another difference in usage, which is that

'are you going' is used much more often than 'will you go' presumably by native speakers of English, and this is true for both American and British English.

enter image description here

Community
  • 1
English Student
  • 7,372
1

We use "going to" for planned activities, and "will" for promises and predictions.

"Are you going to England this summer?" Is asking if the person plans to do that.

"Will you go to England this summer?" Is asking for a statement of certainty or a promise.

In many cases, "will" and "going to" can be used interchangeably without much change in meaning or understanding by the listener. I feel that this is one such case. There are others where this is not true.

michael_timofeev
  • 7,162
  • Where is your evidence that most English speakers distinguish between 'going to' and 'will' like that? I very much doubt that most people conceptualise them exactly like that. – curiousdannii Aug 22 '15 at 06:48
  • @curiousdannii and how do you feel English speakers conceptualize them? – michael_timofeev Aug 22 '15 at 06:52
  • I can tell that there is a slight difference but I can't explain it (yet). Which means that at least for me I know that it's not as clear as you claim it is. But you're the one writing the answer so you're the one who needs to provide evidence for your claims (or at least explain who the 'we' is, because it can't include everyone.) – curiousdannii Aug 22 '15 at 06:54
  • 1
    @curiousdannii so what source of evidence would satisfy you? A quote from a grammar book? "Research" on instances of use on Google? If you disagree with my point of view, post your own answer. I'm just a language teacher who needs to explain this sort of stuff on a daily basis to non-native speakers, none of whom appreciate or want lengthy pontificating. They use "will" for everything and think "going to" is some sort of mystery that excludes them from the club. My answer satisfies most instances. – michael_timofeev Aug 22 '15 at 07:01
  • Sure, an explanation from a grammar (such as the CGEL) would be great. And I can sympathise that TESOL is hard! – curiousdannii Aug 22 '15 at 07:24
  • @curiousdannii look in chapters 20 through 24 of Murphy's Grammar in Use. He uses "intend." I find students respond better to "plan." Also, Duckworth's Business Grammar in Practice, unit 12 to 14. I have other resources, and aside from a change in terminology, they all pretty much say the same thing. I gave a simple answer that I feel can help someone (possibly an ESL learner) better understand the differences between going to and will. Mr. Lawler points out that "will" also has a "willingness" meaning. I understand that, but how many of my students really know the word "willingness?" – michael_timofeev Aug 22 '15 at 07:41
  • For intermediate and Upp-Int students: "I will see John" Stress the will and meanwhile stamp your foot angrily as if to emphasize that is your "will". "Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven" a line from the Our Father pray, if your students are familiar with the pray in their native tongue then they should understand the meaning of the noun will – Mari-Lou A Aug 22 '15 at 08:03
  • But generally speaking, the different forms of future are often interchangeable. "I'll take the bus tomorrow" "I'm going to take the bus tomorrow", "I'm taking the bus tomorrow" and "I'll be taking the bus tomorrow" all mean the same. But if you're a teacher you have to be able to say when they aren't interchangeable. – Mari-Lou A Aug 22 '15 at 08:09
  • @Mari-LouA Thank you Mari Lou, however I'm Buddhist and most of my Taiwanese students are not Christians and would feel uncomfortable with this use. Also, they are engineers and doctors and stock brokers at the exchange and would be critical of this approach. I've spent several years trying to figure out a sure-fire way to help them understand, and the best I have come up with (that seems to help a lot) is the promise / plan idea. I know "willingness" but they don't (or think they do, but don't.) – michael_timofeev Aug 22 '15 at 08:11
  • @Mari-LouA I wonder if they really are interchangeable. I think much of this is programmed into us from an early age and we subconsciously make a decision between "I'm going to take the bus," and "I'm taking the bus." I think future research will show that for native brains there is a difference and it's not so subtle...we just haven't unlocked the code, yet. I think if you asked English speakers to label pictures with "he's going to take..." and "He's taking..." the difference would become clear. – michael_timofeev Aug 22 '15 at 08:16
  • Labelling pictures, depends on the picture. If the image shows someone is "about" to take a bus, then a native speaker might well choose "going to". I don't see any significant differences when a time expression is used. You can adjust my previous example to: "He will do as I say" or "They will obey my orders". Do a role play. Even if students are business men and professionals, a little fun and games in the class can be memorable experience, and helps clarify meaning. – Mari-Lou A Aug 22 '15 at 08:18
  • @Mari-LouA I like that idea...an activity to help them. I have a "one-sheeter" I use that needs an activity. This gives me some ideas. Thank you. – michael_timofeev Aug 22 '15 at 08:21
0

;@kld_rm

  1. Are you going to England this summer? are you going expresses plans that you made in the past for the future considerations, here it means that in the past you thought in the matter and as a result you planned to visit England in the future "this summer "summer is still to come" for instance, I planned in 2016 to buy a car in 2018 so I could say: I am going to buy a car in 2018. it is grammatically quite correct.

  2. Will you go to England this summer? will you in this context means you have not decided yet whether or not to visit England this summer it is simple future. hope it helps!

kld_rm
  • 1
  • Welcome to English.SE! Your answer would benefit from citations or online references that help explain your answer. Could you add them? – JBH Aug 15 '17 at 14:16
0

''but the only difference I can think of is almost nonsensical''

I beg to differ, greatly.

Think of multiple, infinite even, situations where context, urgency and power relations come into play when using ''will you...'' vs ''are you going to...''.

Take a work/office relationship — one employee to a superior asks ''Are you going to authorize extra hours for Christmas overtime this year?'' versus ''Will you (or won't you) authorize extra hours for Christmas overtime this year?''

I included (or won't you) because it's necessary to take into account that when you use ''Will you..'' you are automatically implying that you're also asking ''or won't you'' in the same sentence. ''Will you'' clearly feels more direct and not so passive or polite as ''are you going to'', and depending on the tone of voice can even be confrontational and/or be perceived as putting someone on the spot.

Ergo ''Conclusion: semantically there is no difference.'' — again, I beg to differ, vehemently, because context is king.

Alejandro Moreno S.
  • 1
-1

Because the verb "will" is used with a second verb, "going," it is an auxiliary verb. The most related definitions of the auxiliary verb "will" from Merriam-Webster are:

1—used to express desire, choice, willingness, consent, or in negative constructions refusal • no one would take the job • if we will all do our best • will you please stop that racket

3—used to express futurity • tomorrow morning I will wake up in this first-class hotel suite — Tennessee Williams

6— (a) used to express determination, insistence, persistence, or willfulness • I have made up my mind to go and go I will; (b) used to express inevitability • accidents will happen

Definitions #3 and #6 are inappropriate in this case because the statement is expressed as a question. The form of definition #3 is that of an expressed anticipation, but nevertheless a conclusion, as in "You will go to England this summer." The form of definition #6 is used to answer a question, as in "You will go to England this summer!" 

The differences between my previous two example sentences and your second example sentence are punctuation and the word order of the subject in relation to the auxiliary verb.

Will you go to England this summer? (Definition #1)

You will go to England this summer. (Definition #3)

You will go to England this summer! (Definition #6)

Once again relying on Merriam-Webster, the defnition of "are" is:

Present tense second-person singular and present tense plural of be

Your first example sentence is an example of the present tense, second-person singular. (Rewording your example as present tense, plural results in, "We are going to England this summer.") As with your use of the verb "will," the verb "be" (expressed in its present tense, second-person form "are") is also combined with a second verb, "going," and is therefore an auxiliary verb. The only relevant definition of "be" from Merriam-Webster is:

2—used as the auxiliary of the present participle in progressive tenses expressing continuous action • he is reading • I have been sleeping

In this form and as a question, the verb "are" expresses the idea that the decision to go to England should be well established and the questioner is asking for verification that the decision is still valid. Because this form of the verb "be" expresses continuous action, it implies that knowledge of the decision to go to England was known in the past.

In conclusion, and to answer your question.

Are you going to England this summer? means both questioner and the person questioned knew in the past about the decision to travel to England and that the decision to travel had been made. The question is asked to verify the decision is still valid.

Will you go to England this summer? means either the decision to travel to England was not previously known or, if it was, the decision had not been made. The question is an invitation to make the decision.

Finally, please note that despite my inability to find a specific reference to establish it, and to complicate this discussion even more than it already is, the question "Will you go to England this summer?" can be used colloquially as a very formal and polite version of "Are you going to England this summer?" Used in this context, the two sentences are identical, and this is likely the cause for the many answers that express the idea of equality. However, without surrounding dialog or character development in a story, this equality should not be assumed.

Community
  • 1
JBH
  • 1,708
  • 7
  • 19
  • 1
    Could the downvoter please explain the weakness in my answer? I'm delighted to correct it. – JBH Aug 15 '17 at 16:08
-2

"be going to" shows decision or plan but "will" just shows an event happening in future. So both can be used with two different connotations.

KillingTime
  • 6,206
user393022
  • 1