I had a hard time trying to word this and I hope I didn't over-think it and make a total mess of it.
I just can't think of a word even close and its driving me crazy. lol I'm interested to hear all opinions and suggestions.
I had a hard time trying to word this and I hope I didn't over-think it and make a total mess of it.
I just can't think of a word even close and its driving me crazy. lol I'm interested to hear all opinions and suggestions.
the need to form one's own opinion of someone new rather than blindly accepting the opinion of a third party
see for oneself
Example: "Believe me, she's a manipulative gossip, you're just going to be wasting your time with her." "Maybe so, but I need to see for myself."
I don't think there is a single word, but I can suggest "shaping your own opinion"
"First impressions can be deceiving" especially when a third party tries to influence them by giving you beforehand, a ready-made portrait of what a stranger is like. It's up to you to be clever and patient enough to "shape your own opinion about someone", and it takes time.
Surely you also want to take into account how close you are to whoever is trying to influence you and how much both of you share the same values.
First impressions can be deceiving" means that an impression you hold--positive or negative--may not be accurate until you completely understand the item or situation. It is important to remember this because first impressions can be difficult to overcome.
skeptic (or sceptic) - a person who questions the validity or authenticity of something purporting to be factual.
In practice there's a grey area between not believing [some purported "fact"] and believing [that fact] to be untrue. In the religious context that distinction might be expressed using agnostic and atheist. In the more general context I'm slightly inclined to think skeptic and cynic make a similar distinction (if you are in fact right, it's easier to convince a skeptic than a cynic), but that's probably just a personal opinion.
It's all a matter of context, of course. Most right-thinking people today would say climate change / Holocaust skeptic represents a "pejorative" usage (someone who refuses to believe what others accept as true), but I'm sure almost all of these written instances of [So-and-so was] by nature a sceptic are at least "neutrally descriptive", if not actually approbatory.
As a single word, the closest I can think of is to judge meaning:
form an opinion or conclusion about: (ODO)
- it is hard to judge whether such opposition is justified
- judging from his letters home, Monty was in good spirits
along the idiomatic line, the expression don't take someone or something at face value can be used to convey the concept you are describing:
Take someone or something at face value:
- to accept someone or something just as it appears; to believe that the way things appear is the way they really are. (AHD)
A doubting Thomas is a skeptic who refuses to believe without direct personal experience—a reference to the Apostle Thomas, who refused to believe that the resurrected Jesus had appeared to the ten other apostles, until he could see and feel the wounds received by Jesus on the cross.
If you are looking for the "action" rather than the person, critical thinking may be suitable.