The term subcategories refers to lower level categories.
Which term should I use to refer to higher level categories?
Does supercategories sound right?
The term subcategories refers to lower level categories.
Which term should I use to refer to higher level categories?
Does supercategories sound right?
Supercategories is technically correct.
There are also subscript and superscript to back this example.
Movies often have subtitles, translated texts below the picture. When opera productions project translated texts above the stage, they are called surtitles.
Well, there is no defined prefix or word to be an opposite of "sub".
However, the higher level for "subcategories" is simply categories and the lower level is sub-subcategories and to go a third level down is sub-sub-subcategories and so on.
The prefix that springs to mind for me is meta- which I believe I picked up from reading Gödel Escher Bach by Douglas Hofstadter. He even uses it as a standalone word.
And coincidentally enough in the RELATED box for this question is the opposite question!
I don't think there's an antonym for "sub" since we use "sub" to talk about something which is a level down from something else. For example, "sub-category" is a category within a category. If you have to go further, you may use "sub-sub category." But in the end, the only category above all of these is simply a "category."
If you were to refer to the first category from which the "sub-category" and "sub-sub category" are taking birth, you may do so with "main category."
Hope I answered your question.
I recommend the following sites for great grammar info:
I was wondering if it could be used "up" in this case.
Examples: Top down and bottom up, up-grade and down-grade, upbeat and downbeat, upwards and downwards.. etc. So if you have a sub-project does it sound weird to call its superproject an "up-project", as super is also used for bigger/better/more-performative.. ? – AMDP Mar 06 '19 at 15:32