I know that proof readingis when someone read an article over and over again to fix grammar mistake(s) and or spelling error(s). But I am somehow confused that what the difference is with copy-editing? Is there something additional in copy-editing or is it something entirely different?
Asked
Active
Viewed 229 times
1
lonesome
- 330
1 Answers
2
The difference is at what stage in production editorial process each step occurs.
Copy editing involves revising an early stage draft or manuscript for format, style and accuracy before it is typeset. A copy editor is looking chiefly to correct or improve the work of the writer.
Proofreading literally means to check the galley proof for errors. A proof is what you make on a printing press or printer so you can see how the typesetting will actually come out. A proofreader is looking chiefly for mistakes made by the typesetter.
Trevor Reid
- 420
semanticof the article is addressed in copy-editing? Did I get it right? – lonesome Mar 05 '16 at 14:54The writer is meant not to make mistakes; the copy editor is meant to pick up and correct mistakes that do get made; the proof-reader is meant to check that the test print - proof - matches what the copy editor sent to the type-setter, and two caveats.
More…
– Robbie Goodwin Jul 13 '17 at 19:09With or without that limitation a proof-reader will doubtless flag mistakes but unlike the copy-editor, shouldn’t automatically correct mistakes which do match the original.
– Robbie Goodwin Jul 13 '17 at 19:14