5th is fifth, 4th is fourth, 3rd is third, 2nd is second. People in races come fifth, fourth, third, and second. Divisions are one fifth, one fourth, one third, and one half?
Why is it one half and not one second, following the ordinal numbers?
Asked
Active
Viewed 2,229 times
5
-
It's always seemed to me that it should be "tooth" (and "threeth"). – Hot Licks Apr 23 '16 at 12:46
-
@HotLicks Wouldn't that be spelled twoth? – WS2 Apr 23 '16 at 13:20
-
1If you said "one second" instead of "one half", it would be understood as seconds of time, perhaps. i.e. one sixtieth of a minute (1/60, not 160) ;) – NVZ Apr 23 '16 at 15:58
-
@WS2 - Not with my lisp. – Hot Licks Apr 23 '16 at 21:05
1 Answers
7
I suppose because, in the everyday speech of ordinary people, the use of half long predated the other fractions.
This is the earliest entry in the OED, from the year 835.
Charter in Old Eng. Texts 447, & him man selle an half swulung an ciollan dene.
Whereas the earliest reference to third as a fraction (as opposed to an ordinal number) is from half a millennium later ▸c1384.
Bible (Wycliffite, E.V.) (Douce 369(2)) (1850) 1 Macc. x. 29 Nowe Y assoile ȝou..of tributis, and I forȝeue to ȝou the pricis of salt, and forȝeue crownys, and the thriddis [a1425 L.V. thridde part] of seed.
WS2
- 64,657
-
1This is an unbelievably cool answer! How were you able to look up those dates so easily? – zachwill Jan 07 '22 at 20:36
-
1@zachwill Simply that I have on-line access to the Oxford English Dictionary, where for every sense of every word it provides examples of its historical use over the centuries. As a record of the history of the English language there is nothing to compare to it. Thank you for your complimentary remark. – WS2 Jan 07 '22 at 21:36