Say I used the sentence:
We belong doing this.
In this case, belong would be the auxiliary verb, similar to should or ought to be, and doing would be the full verb.
Is this incorrect, or simply an uncommon use of the word?
Say I used the sentence:
We belong doing this.
In this case, belong would be the auxiliary verb, similar to should or ought to be, and doing would be the full verb.
Is this incorrect, or simply an uncommon use of the word?
Per the Oxford Modern English Grammar by Bas Aarts, there's a NICE answer to this question:
We didn't do this.
* We belongn't doing this.
Did we do this?
* Belong we do this?
We can do this, and so can they.
* We belong do this, and so belong they.
We most certainly did do that!
* We most certainly belong do that!
Zero for four. Belong is not an auxiliary.
I just noticed in the Merriam-Webster online definition that it's a verbal auxiliary. As the other answer implies, this remains colloquial. Much appreciated.
– noone Oct 13 '16 at 03:34In comments, John Lawler wrote:
This is not a feature of any standard English, but it does occur in several English-based creole languages (like Tok Pisin in New Guinea), where belong -- spelt as bilong or blong -- is used as an auxiliary of several types, indicating possession, subordination, and continuous aspect, among other things.