I asked a question like this before, but I didn't give my reasoning. I'm asking about the comma after "and," "but," "or," "then." I have the idea that if you begin a sentence with either one of those words, and if it's related to the sentence before it, you should place a comma after it. Here's what I mean:
Instead of writing this:
"I went to school, and I talked to my friend Daniel."
You could write it as this:
"I went to school. And, I talked to my friend Daniel."
In that sentence, I feel like by adding a comma after "and" would make the sentence seem related to the one previous said. Here's another example:
Instead of writing this:
"She's going to the store first, and then she'll pick up the kids from school."
You could write it as this:
"She's going to the store first. Then, she'll pick up the kids from school."
My question is asking if this would be a good a good thing to do, add a comma after a coordinating conjunction when it begins at the beginning of a sentence and if it's related to what was said before. Two more example:
Instead of writing this:
"She used to work at a restaurant, but now she works as a teacher."
You could write it as this:
"She used to work at a restaurant. Now, she works as a teacher."
Instead of writing this:
"You can choose to go to the park, or you could choose to go to the beach.*"
You could write it as:
"You can choose to go to the park. Or, you could choose to go to the beach."
No comma makes a useful difference. Starting with a conjunction denies the meaning of “conjunction”.
The “store/school” example is better but still not good. Try those sentences without commas and explain the results.
Can you post your views on “restaurant/teacher”?
"You can choose to go to the park, or you could choose to go to the beach" can't work. “Can” and “could” don't match and wrongly forcing “Or” in there won’t help.
– Robbie Goodwin Dec 06 '18 at 00:44