Given the choice of these two, which sound most natural?
I wish there were something I could do for you. I wish there was something I could do for you.
If both sound equally natural, I'd prefer the first.
Asked
Active
Viewed 3.8k times
1
-
1Which sounds more natural is subjective. Even to the same person at different times or regarding certain vocabulary or the perceived formality. – Arm the good guys in America May 29 '17 at 14:53
-
1Of course if the "something" is plural it is always "were" e.g. *I wish there were chairs to sit on". – WS2 May 29 '17 at 21:52
-
I will give you permission to use the first. (I like it better too!) – aparente001 May 30 '17 at 03:46
-
Thanks, WS2. I was wondering if "something" could take a plural. – Gelb May 30 '17 at 16:17
-
Appreciated, aparente001 – Gelb May 30 '17 at 16:17
1 Answers
3
There are two questions that need to be answered here.
First, is there still the slightest chance that there is something I can do for you? For example, I might think that there is probably nothing I can do for you, but I still need to think about it a bit before I can be sure. In that case, I'll say "I wish there was something I could do for you."
Second, how formal is the language you're using? If there is absolutely no chance that I can do anything for you, and I'm speaking formally, then I should say "I wish there were something I could do for you." If there's no chance at all that I can do anything for you, and I'm speaking in a neutral or informal register, then I can use either was or were.
user49640
- 46
-
- I would like to make it sound as if there's nothing that can be done. 2. It's in an informal context. By the way, what do you make of WS2's comment above? WS2 writes that if "something" is plural, then it is always were.
– Gelb May 30 '17 at 16:19 -
@user49640, would you mind explaining why it makes a difference whether or not there is a chance? Is it because having to think about it makes it a hypothetical, and therefore we need to use subjunctive mood, while if we're really sure there's no chance, then it's not hypothetical, so we use indicative mood? – jbyler Aug 31 '22 at 18:29