5

I'm looking for a noun or adjective noun combination that, as clearly as possible, explicitly identifies employees that don't have anyone reporting to them.

The closest existing question I could find was A word for people who work under a manager and it doesn't help me because people who fit that description are not precluded from having subordinates of their own.

Required example: We categorize employees as upper management when they report only to the board of directors. Middle management personnel report to another employee and also have employees reporting to them. [some noun or adjective noun combo] are employees that have no subordinates in the company.

Laurel
  • 66,382
bielawski
  • 163
  • 4
    Is there a reason why workers or non-management won't work? – Davo Jun 16 '17 at 13:39
  • 1
    I assume you are looking for a formal word and not something more jokey? Otherwise I'd suggest "minions". (Banana!) – AndyT Jun 16 '17 at 13:39
  • 1
    No reason for non-management to be insufficient. I'm neither in HR, nor have an extensive vocabulary so I only thought there might be a word in general use that I either never heard or couldn't recall.
    I do like minions but in the context of writing software that will hopefully be used by many organizations I'd worry about a user being offended.
    – bielawski Jun 16 '17 at 13:48
  • 1
    Line workers or individual contributors. But however you phrase it, it comes across as euphemism for peons. – Dan Bron Jun 16 '17 at 14:02
  • I totally agree. I actually looked up synonyms for peon before posting but either the 'employee of this company' aspect was lost or it only covered a subset of real company peons. Like '[anything] contributor' doesn't sufficiently preclude non-employees and 'line' workers doesn't seem to cover people like journalists. Davo's suggestion is looking like my best useable option in the time I've got. Thanks! – bielawski Jun 16 '17 at 14:35
  • In the US, you can usually use "non-exempt employees", as in not-exempt-from-federal-overtime, as by definition most "exempt employees" supervise others. There are some additional exceptions, though (e.g. schoolteachers and, for some reason, movie theater employees), thus this is a comment rather than suggestion. If you could use an informal term a la minions, I like "underlings". – 1006a Jun 16 '17 at 14:43
  • @1006a -- I disagree that "exempt employees" equates to supervises others. Scroll down on the page to which you linked and you'll see two more categories in addition to Executive: Professional and Administrative. Computer programmers, engineers, artists, designers, and many other professionals are exempt without having subordinates. The same is true of HR, accounting, and other administrative staff. – Roger Sinasohn Jun 16 '17 at 19:42
  • @RogerSinasohn As I said, there are additional exceptions, so it's not an answer, just a comment. But despite what seems like the norm at SE, the jobs you've mentioned are a small percentage of the entire workforce, and most employees-without-subordinates fall into the "non-exempt" category. – 1006a Jun 16 '17 at 19:54
  • Lately individual contributor for someone with no underlings – Andrew Lazarus Jun 16 '17 at 15:31

4 Answers4

3

There's rank and file:

the individuals who constitute the body of an organization, society, or nation as distinguished from the leaders.

the chosen few might have the opportunity for a trip in the space shuttle, but it will be a while before the rank and file are taking space trips.

from m-w.com

Hellion
  • 59,365
1

A nonmanagement employee is:

Not a member of management

Davo
  • 7,204
  • 5
  • 29
  • 50
1

[I have to add this separately because I'm not allowed to comment on other's posts yet]

Staff: Where I've worked, 'staff' has been used to distinguish people on the company' payroll, from contractors and consultants, so it does not have anything to do with management responsibilities (apart from the fact that a consultant manager will not be in the company's own management hierarchy).

Ent
  • 11
0

I believe the word is " associate"

Oxford dictionaries.com defines it as "a person with limited or subordinate membership of an organization."

Dictionary.com defines it as '' a person who is admitted to a subordinate degree of membership in an association or institution:"

And during my stint as a customer care 'associate' with Dell computers, nobody ever reported to me. We were at the bottom of the hierarchical setup of the organization. We refer to ourselves as 'associates'. So does the organization.