4

The first printed page in the scanned online version of Analytical Solid Geometry by Shanti Narayan says, "the book was drenched". I'm positive it doesn't have anything to do with wetness. So what does it mean here? (There's nothing else written on the page. There are a couple of blank pages before and after this printed page.)

Screencap of scanned book

All the examples I've found are from Osmania University Library in Hyderabad. Could this be a term specific to Indian-English or a mistranslation from Hindi or another Indian language?

Laurel
  • 66,382
yathish
  • 275
  • 1
    Please [edit] your question to include the full context of this phrase. It's your responsibility as the questioner to provide the context in the body of the question itself (bear in mind that one day or another, that link may break, which would render your question meaningless to future readers; it's also simply courteous to do the legwork yourself when asking others to answer your question). – Dan Bron Aug 29 '17 at 18:51
  • @DanBron thank you for stating your concern. The question is complete in itself though. Link is just a supplement. – yathish Aug 29 '17 at 18:53
  • 6
    Absent context, it simply means "the book was drenched" with the conventional, dictionary meanings of those words. That's all anyone can call you. – Dan Bron Aug 29 '17 at 18:54
  • 3
    As Dan noted, there isn't enough context in the question. Why are you positive it doesn't have anything to do with wetness? – MrHen Aug 29 '17 at 19:26
  • @rjpond very unlikely that anyone would scan a wet book. They would leave it for a week to dry out. Otherwise the pages would tear, they would stick to the scanner, etc. – Weather Vane Aug 29 '17 at 20:20
  • 1
    I looked at about a dozen scans with this odd tag, and they all derived from the library of Osmania University in Hyderabad. I suspect a mistranslation of this book has been scanned or uploaded or something of that sort from Hindi or Telugu. – StoneyB on hiatus Aug 29 '17 at 22:53
  • 1
    @StoneyB How can we leave it at that? You're probably right, but I want to know the people at Osmania University meant! – ab2 Aug 29 '17 at 22:57
  • It should be noted that two different browsers I tried bring you in on the title page. You have to page backwards several pages to get to what I presume is supposed to be the inside front cover to find these words. When you get there they don't make any sense. Best guess I can make is that it's saying that the book was water-damaged. – Hot Licks Aug 29 '17 at 23:06
  • 2
    @ab2 I suggest you put this to someone fluent both in English and in a number of Indian languages. – StoneyB on hiatus Aug 29 '17 at 23:10
  • 1
    @StoneyB thank you for your research. I am fluent in Telugu, Hindi and even English for that matter. This word doesn't have anything to do with Indian languages as far as I can tell. Others, I'm positive it's not about wetness because that doesn't make sense! In what scenario will it be printed inside the book, after it got wet, and then digitised too?! – yathish Aug 30 '17 at 01:36
  • @yathish What about ab2's answer below, indicating that what is meant is something like 'discarded' or 'jettisoned' or 'deaccessioned'? Do you know of any Indian language in which the word for 'soak' or 'submerge' overlaps with a term like that? – StoneyB on hiatus Aug 30 '17 at 01:58
  • @StoneyB I've accepted ab2's answer for now. I'm looking for an original source on a post made inside the link. I don't reckon university folk would insert a Hindi/Telugu word in the middle of an English sentence (no, I can't think of any such related word). In any case I left the last part of the now edited question untouched - so that any possible link to Indian languages mayn't be ruled out. If you go through the link shared by ab2, a relation to Indian language seems even less likely. – yathish Aug 30 '17 at 02:09
  • I'm from India and I'm a jack of 6 languages. I've never heard such an expression. And my Google Fu didn't help much either. – NVZ Aug 30 '17 at 03:01
  • 1
    This isn't a question about the English language, the plain meaning of the words is not the issue, it is clearly some "code" that was only meaningful to whoever scanned and uploaded the books. This question should be closed as off-topic. – BradC Aug 30 '17 at 13:33
  • 9
    @yathish The text in question was not printed inside the book, any more than “OU_164820” was printed in the book. That is automated text presumably added by the scanning software when the book was scanned. This is indicated by the fact that the default view (as Hot Licks says) jumps to the actual title page, and by the fact that (like the text on the facing page) it is much sharper than the actually printed text. The first spread presumably does not exist in the real book at all, and it may well mean that the book had gotten drenched at some point before being scanned. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Aug 30 '17 at 17:21
  • This begins to remind me of a certain *"little yellow axe"*, @Dan Bron... is that the meaning of covfefe? – English Student Sep 01 '17 at 09:17
  • I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because questions about mistranslations from other languages or non-standard English are off-topic here. – David Sep 07 '17 at 08:01
  • 3
    "I'm positive it doesn't have anything to do with wetness." Why? that's bizarre. it obviously just means the (original) book got soaked, drenched. – Fattie Jan 06 '18 at 17:58
  • This Q just has nothing to do with the English language. The one and only meaning of drenched is trivially found in a dictionary. (If "drenched" is some sort of specific corporate or software terminology in the system at hand - so what? Who cares?) – Fattie Jan 06 '18 at 18:02
  • 1
    I’m voting to close this question because it is based upon the erroneous belief "I'm positive it doesn't have anything to do with wetness.", when it clearly does. – Greybeard Mar 13 '21 at 19:27
  • @Greybeard Let's assume drenched here indeed means the book fell in water. That would mean the book was scanned before it was drenched (because all the pages inside the scanned version look intact) and later this page at the beginning was added to indicate it was drenched. Possible, but seems unlikely to me.. – yathish Mar 15 '21 at 14:27
  • @yathish Wetness is not only associated with water. It could be some sort of liquid preservative treatment. – Greybeard Mar 16 '21 at 00:14

4 Answers4

1

This is not an official source, but according to Charles Wm Dimmick on alt.folklore.urban Google Groups, the explanation is more plausible than that the book got wet.

It turns out that if I wait another few minutes the actual book is
there, but the "THIS BOOK IS DRENCHED" =A0is the first thing to appear.
Further research shows that this message shows up on about 40-50 books
which were digitized by Osmania University, and means that immediately
after digitizing the book they purged the physical book from their
collection.

Addition: Evidence that drenched means water damage: From Cyber Diary: Faceless Libraries in a Facebook Age, (Scroll down to Comment by Ananthanarayanan Vaidyanathan):

Recently the great Hindi Prachar Sabha Library at Madras...one of the biggest and greatest in India suffered due to the flood....We find that even in the digitized versions of many valuable books..that many pages are missing due to vandalism by borrowers or due to natural calamities like moth attack and drenching and so on. My heart sank when some very valuable books downloaded from sites like Osmania University contain the warning that the contents of the book are not complete due to missing pages, drenching, etc.....

ab2
  • 26,253
  • Awesome. I've posted on that group as well, just in case the OP there might reply. – yathish Aug 30 '17 at 01:51
  • 5
    I wonder why they used drenched to mean that. OED has no record of any similar usage. – Andrew Leach Aug 30 '17 at 14:44
  • 1
    I e-mailed the Osmania University Library (OUL) at their "contact us" e-mail address. See here https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/10737/should-this-question-about-this-book-is-drenched-be-closed/10739#10739 for my e-mail to OUL. If it turns out that the books were water damaged, that will just show that the simplest explanation is often best! – ab2 Aug 30 '17 at 19:49
  • the quote you made makes no mention of getting wet. 2) following the link to the usenet archive, Dimmick is responding to someone who said "Maybe the original book got wet and now all the ebook copies don't
  • work. " which is entirely speculative, and therefore not a definitive answer.

    – Mitch Aug 31 '17 at 03:28
  • @Mitch I e-mailed OUL because I am dissatisfied with what we were able to find. Either OUL will answer, and the mystery will be solved, or OUL will not answer and we should move on. – ab2 Aug 31 '17 at 03:36
  • 1
    @ab2 I have no hopes on OUL checking it's mail. Much less on reverting to it! If someone who finds this post, who also happens to live nearby OUL, contacts the library in person then we may dig out something. – yathish Sep 01 '17 at 11:25
  • @yathish It was an obvious thing to do and took only a minute. If they don't reply, little will have been lost. – ab2 Sep 01 '17 at 12:10