0

When we start sentences with something like "To the best of our knowledge, ..." or"To achieve this, ...", do we need the commas? For example, which one is correct between "To the best of our knowledge, he is not coming." and "To the best of our knowledge he is not coming."?

I tried to look at the rule book for using comma and did not find a rule that applies; thus perhaps commas are not needed. However, I saw commas quite often. It is even there in the example in the merriam-webster dictionary: "To the best of his knowledge, no one had called all morning."

Danu
  • 109

4 Answers4

2

If it is not in the style manual, then it is generally preference; however, I tend to defer to adding the comma in this situation.

A short sentence, like the example provided, the comma will not change the meaning of the sentence one way or another. Longer sentences, the comma could change the meaning - where you draw the line...? That can be difficult to say; hence, my preference for using the comma.

Also, I see the comma as guidance for how the author wishes the sentence to be read - i.e., it reflects how the sentence is to be read as though it were spoken. That isn't necessarily applicable in this situation, but a general rule I find to be helpful when deciding to use a comma or not.

J. Mac Jordan
  • 60
1

A lot of this aspect of punctuation is mandated by usage and not style guides. When you look on corpora sites such as BNC you find that the absence of a comma is unusual in this particular case, and so the example you saw was fairly typical.

Take the second sentence above: after 'BNC', I did not use a comma. I wondered whether I was unusual in this, but a quick glance on BNC told me after this particular subordinating construction we are less likely to see commas. So I've at least got the crowd (people who write for newspapers, which are edited and proofread) behind me!

If you want to know more and see the examples used by linguists, I'd also do a search for 'discourse marker' and 'comment clause.

tardy pigeon
  • 755
  • 4
  • 8
1

It's an introductory clause that requires a comma.

Rose
  • 11
  • 1
  • 2
    Your answer could be improved with additional supporting information. Please [edit] to add further details, such as citations or documentation, so that others can confirm that your answer is correct. You can find more information on how to write good answers in the help center. – Community Mar 12 '22 at 16:24
0

I'd say do not use the comma.

A general rule of thumb is "if you can do without the comma, do without it". This means that if the comma is not serving a particular purpose, such as eliminating confusion or indicating a pause where otherwise none would have been taken, then it's better to do without it.

Using unnecessary commas in a sentence could be distracting for readers.

AnuTuyi
  • 1