What do you call a person who hates pictures, drawings, photos, and images of all kinds and finds them unnecessary and uninteresting. I found a word iconoclast to have a similar meaning, but it had a strong religious colour. I'm not talking about people who hates their pictures taken. I'm taking about people who don't like pictures in general.
Asked
Active
Viewed 1.5k times
2
-
I'd likely coin a word like "picturephobe" or "graphicphobe". Slightly more formal would be "graphics averse" or "graphics abhorrent". – Hot Licks Mar 24 '19 at 17:51
-
English paintings were destroyed in great numbers by the Puritans during the Civil War; but they also hated dances, theatre, fairs, and holidays. – Hugh Mar 24 '19 at 19:00
-
It's not a fear suffix we're looking for here, it's a hate suffix. "Antipictatorial" or similar, if that were a real word. – Wayfaring Stranger Mar 24 '19 at 19:35
-
This is some help: Is there a suffix for loathing? https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/58508/is-there-a-suffix-for-loathing – Wayfaring Stranger Mar 24 '19 at 19:45
-
It looks like, someone has to come up with a neologism. Until then OP can use "aversion to the images [of type]" – Ubi.B Mar 25 '19 at 01:44
-
moron comes to mind... – Jim Jul 22 '19 at 00:17
3 Answers
1
An iconoclast is, in its literal sense, someone who breaks images. The word derives from Greek εἰκών eikōn ‘image’ (also ‘shape’, ‘form’) and the verb κλάω klaō ‘break’ and literally means an image breaker.
As you’ve noted, though, the word is very heavily religiously laden, and moreover it’s mostly used in an extended, figurative sense, referring to someone who challenges (especially religious) views and principles.
There is a more appropriate formation also based on εἰκών, with the more familiar -phobe suffix, namely an iconophobe.
This is hardly a common word, but it is used. Wikipedia has an article on it, which describes it thus in its opening lines:
Iconophobia (literally fear of icons) refers to an aversion to images, especially religious icons. Iconophobia is differentiated from iconoclasm in that iconophobia refers to the aversion to or hatred of the images whereas iconoclasm refers to the actual destruction of images that may arise from iconophobia.
This is still a word with close ties to religion and religious philosophy. If you are going to use it in a written piece, you would be well-advised to specify if you’re using it in a non-religious context to refer to someone who just dislikes images in general.
Janus Bahs Jacquet
- 32,382
0
Their attitude might be described as "austere" pertaining to pictures, and possibly other images, decorations, or adornments as well. They prefer life to be lived and represented as "plain" and "real" rather than as any form of "ancillary" or "artificial" representation. Pictures probably seem like contrived images to them.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/austere
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/plain
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/real
user22542
- 4,492
-
1All these words are far too broad to answer the question; they are not related to images, just adjectives that could be used to describe someone with this outlook. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Mar 24 '19 at 18:43
-
Actually @Janus, I was only suggesting "austere", but I thought highlighting the others made it clearer. An austere person does not have to be "severe" as some definitions might suggest. I'm sorry the word didn't match your expectations. – user22542 Mar 24 '19 at 20:05
-1
Iconoclam is the social belief in the importance of the description of icons and other images or monuments, most frequently for religious or political reasons. People who engage in or support iconoclasm are called iconoclasts, a term that has come to be applied figuratively to any individual who challenges "cherished beliefs or venerated institutions on the grounds that they are erroneous or pernicious."
It's the current figurative use of the word iconoclast applied that I would only recommend using because it's the only one most English speakers understand (and that's only true amongst college educated English speakers). The word, even in its figurative sense has only a very low word frequency use among intellectuals, and I'd say virtually is never used in English in its non-figurative sense. So I'll stand by my statement that I have never heard of a single word in English for a person who „hates, pictures, drawings, photos, etc and finds them unnecessary and uninteresting.“
Glorfindel
- 14,499
John
- 17
-
Is exchanging quotation marks in the German tradition for conventional English practice considered a constructive edit on this stack? I am not picking on John. I've seen this a few times and wasn't sure whether to change it during my other edits. – Trevor Reid Mar 24 '19 at 18:53
-
2
-
English learners need to first start with commonly used phrases and words, and if none exist in the ordinary vernacular, the inquiry should stop there. Once they reach an advanced level in English, they won`t be coming to a board like this asking for help. Steering them in the direction of esoteric books for PhD students or striving to find obscure definitions no one has ever heard of in English is not helpful to a learner. – John Mar 24 '19 at 18:15
-
This, too, should be a comment. Welcome to stackexchange, John. Please, read the FAQ. – Armen Ծիրունյան Mar 24 '19 at 18:29
-
-
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review – TrevorD Mar 24 '19 at 20:29
-
There is no single word I`ve ever heard of in English to describe a person like this. – John Mar 24 '19 at 16:51
-
1There's a line in Mario Klarer's 'an introduction to literary studies' 3rd edition page 2. It says:" the medieval union of word and picture, in which both components of the text formed a single, harmonious entity, slowly disappeared. This modern iconoclasm (i.e., hostility toward pictures) not only restricts the visual dimensions of texts but also sees writing as a medium that can function with little connection to the acoustic element of language." – Julie Mar 24 '19 at 17:02
-
1See my comments below. No one uses iconoclast in its non-figurative original sense. Quoting esoteric books no one but PhD English Literature candidates would read is not helpful for an English learner. – John Mar 24 '19 at 18:08
-
-
-
A comment? It´s an observation perhaps to help the person asking for assistance. This board attracts people who have a variety of questions about Englsh usage. If the person is a native speaker asking an esoteric question for a dissertation, that´s fine. But, I think most are here to learn real English that is written in books, journals and is spoken on the street. To point out a word no one would ever use in English outside a PhD program in English at Harvard is likely not helpful, unless the OP specifically identifies the question as seeking this sort of answer. The OP did not suggest this. – John Mar 24 '19 at 18:22
-
-
As side note, what you call my comments below are really answers. On a Stack Exchange site, an answer is not a comment. What you post in Your answer is an answer, whose purpose is not replying to other comments, as you did. – apaderno Mar 24 '19 at 18:28
-
2@John This site is specifically not geared towards English learners. We have a different site for that, [ell.se]. This site is precisely where esoteric word usage is relevant as an answer. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Mar 24 '19 at 18:37