e.g. [14,6] give 3 and 2.4-approximations for the FVS problem.
Also when do you not use numbers from one to ten as worded.
e.g. The earliest algorithms had an approximation factor of 16, later algorithms improved the approximation factor to ten, 9.5, eight, 6.5 and three respectively.
The cited questions is about why my 2nd question is about the convention and whether or not it applies to a continuous quantity when it takes discrete values e.g. does the rule apply to continuous variables e.g. The height of the ball is maximized at time 2e, four, 4.4,3, 2\pi, 2.5e, eight, 3e, 3 \pi and nine
and yes [14,6] are references listed in my bibliography I've found numbered bibliographies to be quite common but I'm not sure where it is okay to start the sentence with a citation.
e.g. does the rule apply to continuous variables e.g. The height of the ball is maximized at time 2e, four, 4.4,3, 2\pi, 2.5e, eight, 3e, 3 \pi and nine.
– Hao S Sep 21 '19 at 18:39