5

I was surprised to find that there's a growing convention of capitalizing the word "black" when referring to the race, i.e.:

A Black person.

I thought this was wrong, because I thought it was only proper nouns, like cultures, nationalities and ethnicities, that were to be capitalized. Black denotes a race, and nothing more, as there are many nationalities, cultures and ethnicities that fall within the black race. Calling black a culture or ethnicity would be reductive.

However, this capitalization rule apparently applies to race as well; see the 10th item here.

If this rule is in fact true, then that means black is to be capitalized when denoting a person of the black race. It also means that white is to be capitalized when denoting a person of the white race. Caucasian, which is a word denoting a race, is capitalized. It is a synonym to white.

So, if Caucasian is capitalized, and if people want black to be capitalized when referring to race, why isn't white supposed to be capitalized? Is white not a race? I'm no biologist, nor anthropologist, but if white is too genetically broad to be considered a race, then I'm pretty sure black would be too.

EDIT: As user Cascabel pointed out in the comments, Caucasian is derived from the Caucasus Mountains, which is a place, and therefore a proper noun. Therefore, regardless of what capitalization rules one employs, Caucasian has to be capitalized, and is therefore not necessarily an example of people capitalizing racial classification.

EDIT 2:

CMS have changed their preferred capitalization rules as of the 17th edition, which means that the answers to the linked post that this post was designated a duplicate of, are no longer valid.

A. Kvåle
  • 2,127
  • 2
    You appear to refer to a recent trend which sees the term Black capitalized when referring to people or race. So why not White accordingly. That’s a POB issue at best. – user 66974 Apr 05 '21 at 18:07
  • Possibly because Caucasian (not sure if anyone except Americans use that) originally referred to the Caucasus mountain? Just because one or two sources capitalize black and white, I would be careful with that. It sounds a little like "whataboutism"...BTW, as Anthony Burgess once pointed out, there are people in parts of Asia that are just as "black" or even blacker than people from Africa. That muddies the waters... – Cascabel_StandWithUkraine_ Apr 05 '21 at 18:28
  • 1
    There's a lot more that needs to be said about this than comes in a comment to a closed question, but 1) Orthography is a convention. 2) Not everything must be consistent in a convention. 3) There is a reason for (currently) deciding for the convention to change to Black and white. none of these are obvious, but I think (in the US) 'Black' is not a literal, it refers to those of African descent from the slave trade, and is capitalized because people realized it is comparable to Asians, Mormons, British. And 'white' is not capitalized for the same reason, it's not an ethnicity (within the US). – Mitch Apr 05 '21 at 18:30
  • 1
    @Mitch off-topic.... I used to know some people that live in the US who are of Haitian descent, who took exception to the term African-American. And I had a Jamaican ex-roommate once who claimed he was "African by way of Jamaica" to my new roommate who was actually from South Africa. When asked "Do you speak Shangan, or Zulu, or Xhosa?" He replied, and I quote, "Hunnh?" ... "Then you aren't fckn African! You're just another black fella." – Cascabel_StandWithUkraine_ Apr 05 '21 at 18:43
  • 1
    @Mitch: You can still post an answer if you want. 'When a question is closed, the server still accepts answers for 4 hours'. – Decapitated Soul Apr 05 '21 at 18:50
  • 1
    @DecapitatedSoul You have to have already started the answer -before- the item is closed. -and- then you have 4 hours to submit. Once a question is closed you can't start a new answer because it doesn't have a 'answer' button in the UI. – Mitch Apr 05 '21 at 18:55
  • 1
    @Cascabel Right. I could be called Irish-American even though I don't speak Irish or have relatives after 3 generations from there. Words aren't literal, they mean all sorts of different things that are not the first entry in the dictionary. – Mitch Apr 05 '21 at 18:59
  • @Mitch: Did you read the linked answer though? You can still post an answer.. lemme show you: see below: – Decapitated Soul Apr 05 '21 at 19:03
  • @DecapitatedSoul Oh, I see now. I didn't understand what it was saying because it was not referring to how to 'get back' the submit button as the system intended. Rather the 'solution' is a backdoor programming hack, which is not intended by the system designers., ie it is cheating. Yes, it is literally 'possible', but not at all intended and could easily be fixed to prevent it in the future. Clever solution but not expected by the system. – Mitch Apr 05 '21 at 19:51
  • 2
    "Black is not literal, it refers to those of African descent from the slave trade...". That is a very US-centric notion. What would you call a person that is born, raised and living in Africa? Would they not be black? I agree that "black" in the context of classifying people is not always used literally. However, I think it is wrong to use "black" as anything else than either a signifyer of skin color, or as the name of a race. If the latter, than it can be capitalized, but it is no more eligible for capitalization than "white" when used as the name of the race. @Mitch – A. Kvåle Apr 05 '21 at 20:00
  • 1
  • @A.Kvåle Yes, it is very US centric. I did not qualify that I was speaking for AmE. Also, the ''w'hite/'B'lack thing is very recent (at least to me) from even the past year (which means it is probably started gaining currency 5 to 10 years ago. Whether you think it is wrong or logical or not, what I've described is a -convention- and style guides in the US are starting to use it. Since the OP assumes 'Black' is capitalized but not 'white', I take the answer to be at least in the US. – Mitch Apr 05 '21 at 21:23
  • Because 1) it's covert racism and 2) it implied that white people have no culture. – desbest Apr 05 '21 at 22:37
  • The OP has edited this question and there are 2 votes to reopen, but I'm voting to keep it closed. It already has an excellent answer, and the linked duplicate now has a new answer that brings it up-to-date. Any further answers on this topic should be posted on the duplicate rather than here. – Chappo Hasn't Forgotten Apr 11 '21 at 04:03

1 Answers1

2

One explanation for the discrepancy is offered by Nell Irvin Painter in their opinion piece for the Washington Post

These two identities don’t simply mirror each other — one works through a pronounced group identity [Black]; the other more often is lived as unraced individuality [white]. However much you might see yourself as an individual, if you’re black, you also have to contend with other people’s views. W.E.B. Du Bois summed this up as “twoness,” as seeing yourself as yourself but also knowing that other people see you as a black person. You don’t have to be a black nationalist to see yourself as black.

In contrast, until quite recently white Americans rarely saw themselves as raced — as white. Most of them, anyway. The people who have embraced “white” as a racial identity have been white nationalists, Ku Klux Klansmen and their ilk.

In July 20 2020 the following statement was released [emphasis in bold mine.]

NEW YORK (AP) — After changing its usage rules last month to capitalize the word “Black” when used in the context of race and culture, The Associated Press on Monday said it would not do the same for “white.”

The AP said white people in general have much less shared history and culture, and don’t have the experience of being discriminated against because of skin color. […]
CBS News said it would capitalize white, although not when referring to white supremacists, white nationalists or white privilege.

Some proponents believe that keeping white lowercase is actually anti-Black, saying it perpetuates the idea that whites are the default race.

Mari-Lou A
  • 91,183
  • 1
    Thanks for giving me the heads up about the 4 hour grace period... – Cascabel_StandWithUkraine_ Apr 05 '21 at 19:12
  • 1
    Could the naysayers please come back and delete their DVs? I am not asking for an upvote, just a revision. – Cascabel_StandWithUkraine_ Apr 05 '21 at 19:22
  • @Mari-LouA I am assuming that your ultimate purpose is to reopen the Q? I have already VTROed. – Cascabel_StandWithUkraine_ Apr 05 '21 at 19:34
  • 1
    @Cascabel No, my aim was to validate the Community-wiki post. This answer is basically a duplicate, albeit more nuanced and detailed, of another in the older question. Feel free to reopen. I won't protest. – Mari-Lou A Apr 05 '21 at 19:37
  • @Mari-LouA Sometimes I think that we should be comparing older and newer posts to decide on which we would prefer as the best...dictionaries do regular revisions according to new knowledge and language. We should too. – Cascabel_StandWithUkraine_ Apr 05 '21 at 19:43
  • 1
    @Cascabel We can update older posts too. There's even an SE badge called the Necromancer which encourages this behaviour. Still, I wasn't expecting the OP to agree with my judgement call, I mean not as quickly as they did. – Mari-Lou A Apr 05 '21 at 19:49
  • @Mari-LouA Unfortunately, it is called Necromancer because we have to go digging in the cementario for very old questions. Usually it does not come to our attention until we receive a post like this. As for me, I often have what I think are interesting questions (usually while washing my hair) but upon doing the required research, I realize that someone has already done it in a dupe. Sometimes the Q&A is good, but many of the first posts from the beginning of SE would be closed these days for any variety of reasons... – Cascabel_StandWithUkraine_ Apr 05 '21 at 20:12
  • ... I think there should be some kind of balance between automatically VTCing for a crappy dupe in exchange for a higher quality, but newer Q&A. – Cascabel_StandWithUkraine_ Apr 05 '21 at 20:12
  • 1
    @Cascabel: A very similar question arose less than five months ago: Is "Black" correct, incorrect, or could it be used as either "Black" or "black"? I posted an answer to that question because the Associated Press's style guideline on the question had recently changed and the older question didn't include any answers addressing that change. – Sven Yargs Apr 05 '21 at 20:23
  • 1
    @SvenYargs Right...However, I sometimes think that our system of closure for dupe is not actually enhancing the usability of the site. Many new users might stumble upon our site by happenstance, and arrive at the newer question for whatever, google analytics? Then they see it is closed and they say bye bye and we lose a potential new user......I gotta think on that overnight... – Cascabel_StandWithUkraine_ Apr 05 '21 at 20:32
  • There are too many dupes for some questions, and many of them have very good answers.
    That said, I think there needs to be a higher level of moderation that could curate the collection and produce fewer sloppy posts. Right now, it does not look professional.\
    – Cascabel_StandWithUkraine_ Apr 05 '21 at 20:51
  • 1
    @Cascabel: One option that is available to moderators is to merge questions (and answers), which might be helpful in a situation like this one, where the official "open" posted question has only older and arguably somewhat out-of-date answers. But my impression is that EL&U moderators aren't big on merging questions: according to 2020: a year in moderation, the mods at this site performed a total of just eight question mergers in 2020. – Sven Yargs Apr 05 '21 at 22:47