4

Why is only an adverb instead of an adjective in the following sentences?

  • Only Sue and Mark bothered to turn up for the meeting.
  • Only an idiot would do that.

Source: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english-chinese-traditional/only

Andrew Leach
  • 101,901
Ana
  • 187
  • 1
    Do not answer in comments. Write an answer: that's how Stack Exchange works. If you want to migrate this question elsewhere, vote to do that. I've deleted the two conflicting comments. – Andrew Leach Jan 01 '22 at 10:23
  • 4
    Does this answer your question? Does it matter where you put “only”? There are other threads also dealing with 'only'. Personally, I see it as so far from being either an adjective or an adverb that I prefer the class 'limiting modifiers / focus particles'. – Edwin Ashworth Jan 01 '22 at 11:19
  • 1
    See also Do adverbs only 'describe' verbs?. Focusing modifiers aren't mentioned specifically, but the arguable inappropriateness of the 'adverb dustbin class' is discussed. – Edwin Ashworth Jan 01 '22 at 12:25
  • 3
    I'm voting to re-open the question. It does not ask about the position of "only" in a clause, but asks why "only" is an adverb, not an adjective, in the examples cited. – BillJ Jan 01 '22 at 14:26
  • 3
    The distinction between the focusing adverb "only" and the adjective "only" is a tricky one, and well worth discussing on ELU. – BillJ Jan 01 '22 at 14:48
  • 1
    @BillJ Ah, now that you too consider this stuff tricky , it's a big, big relief. I thought I'd screwed up a simple grammatical concept. And thank you for your answer! – user405662 Jan 01 '22 at 14:50

2 Answers2

7

[1] [Only Sue and Mark] bothered to turn up for the meeting.

[2] [Only an idiot] would do that.

In both examples, "only" is an adverb functioning as a focusing modifier in the bracketed noun phrases.

Focusing adverbs modify a wide range of constructions, including noun phrases, but they do not modify nouns or nominals, as opposed to noun phrases.

[3] I don't eat meat, but [only fish].

Here, fish is an NP consisting of just a noun. You could have [4] but not [5]

[4] I eat meat, but [only this kind of fish].

[5] * I eat meat but this [only kind of fish].

In [5] "kind of fish" is a nominal and hence the sentence is ungrammatical.

However, in an appropriate construction "only" can modify a nominal, in which case it is not an adverb but an adjective, as in [6]

[6] My [only reservation] is the cost.

where "only" modifies the nominal "reservation".

BillJ
  • 12,832
  • Thanks for your answer. I'm a little confused when you say "focusing adverbs modify a wide range of constructions, including noun phrases, but they do not modify nouns or nominals, as opposed to noun phrases." Doesn't "only" modify the noun "fish" in [3]? Like you said, a noun phrase can consist of just a noun, and so they are not distinct categories? – Ana Jan 03 '22 at 04:37
  • 1
    @Ana NP and nominal are distinct categories. A nominal is the unit intermediate between the NP and the noun -- it's the noun phrase minus the determiner. "Fish" in [3] is not a nominal but an NP, whereas "reservation" is a nominal in [6], so "only" is an adjective, not a focusing adverb. – BillJ Jan 03 '22 at 14:39
  • I always thought of them as overlapping categories, but now I see what you mean. Thank you very much for your explanation! – Ana Jan 04 '22 at 03:50
4

Only Sue and Mark bothered to turn up for the meeting.

Here, we can replace "only" with merely, solely, exclusively - You will note all are adverbs: we cannot use mere, sole, exclusive.

Only fronts the whole main clause as a free modifier. The same applies to the second.

Greybeard
  • 41,737