I just heard someone say "The noisiest thing outside is the birds". I understand the use of "is" being preceded by the singular "thing". But, the plural "birds" followed by "is", why is this correct? What is generally the rule here?
Asked
Active
Viewed 159 times
0
-
1Not that the spoken has the strictness of the written word, but you could have the thing is or the thing are. I'd go with is. – Yosef Baskin Apr 11 '22 at 03:54
-
@Yosef: the thing are is ungrammatical. Did you mean the things are? – Peter Shor Apr 11 '22 at 11:29
-
2Does this answer your question? Agreement in "[Singular Noun] Is/Are [Plural Noun]"? // In [NP₁] is/are [NP₂], the choice of verb form is always governed by NP₁ (the first noun phrase), whether it is considered the subject or the complement in a case of copular inversion. Easy so far. But NP₁ may look plural but be notionally singular ('Bacon and eggs is my favourite meal.') – Edwin Ashworth Apr 11 '22 at 11:52
-
@PeterShor "I'd go with is" is my way of saying there's no choice to make. – Yosef Baskin Apr 11 '22 at 13:31
-
Then I'll post a comment: the only grammatical choices are the noisiest thing is or the noisiest things are. Since there's more than one thing, things is a little bit better. – Peter Shor Apr 11 '22 at 13:32
-
Mismatches of number with specifying"be" where the subject is singular and the predicative plural are quite common. But with the ascriptive use of "be", mismatches most often have a plural subject in construction with a singular predicative, as in [_Our neighbours] are [a nuisance_]; [_The people who live there] are [a minority cult group_]. – BillJ Apr 11 '22 at 14:53