2

The comments in an older question of mine on E.S.E leave an issue unresolved: What does one call the situation in which a taboo concept is referred to as being a specific case of a more general nonvulgar concept?

The specific example that I would like to address is the Hebrew verb לדעת. This verb has several meanings. One meaning is to have knowledge of. Another meaning is to have sexual relations with. One could argue that the latter is a what for the former?

dotancohen
  • 3,011

2 Answers2

5

As FumbleFingers points out, one 'opposite' of euphemism is

dysphemism

which means a word sounding much worse or more vulgar than the more canonical word for the concept.

But 'opposite' can really go in many directions. Another counterpart to 'euphemism', the one that you seek, is

vulgarity, taboo word, or profanity.

These are words for the concept of 'the word that is being given a euphemism'.

Mitch
  • 71,423
2

I think we're missing the crux of this situation: To know is clearly a euphemism for to have sexual relations with. The latter is the taboo topic that the euphemism refers to.

  • 3
    That might be the case in English, but in (Biblical) Hebrew the words for "to know" and "to have sex with" are homonyms. It is not an euphemism. Hebrew has much fewer words than English and it is not uncommon to have homonyms when the fields of discussion are disparate enough that there will be no confusion. – dotancohen Mar 14 '12 at 17:41