0

The intended meaning is that 'it', described simply, is 'everything'.

Would I write:

It is in short...everything.

Or:

It is, in short...everthing.

Instinctively, I believe that a comma is needed before "in short".

But the confusion arises here:

Is it a common enough phrase that the comma is not needed? Is it a publisher's preference situation? Author's preference? I've seen the phrase 'in short' both with and without commas. Normally two commas are used, as it's a parenthetical, but the ellipsis makes the second one unnecessary.

Heartspring
  • 8,600
  • 6
  • 43
  • 73
AMS
  • 1

1 Answers1

0

It's such a clumsy sentence - more pauses than actual words. I'd opt for "In short it is everything." and ditch all the fussy extras, but that's just me. I learned to write for newspapers so I always look for a short, sharp sentence structure where possible. Best of luck!

  • 1
    Hello, Gristle. Possibly sound advice, but as it doesn't directly answer the actual question, more suitable as a 'comment'. – Edwin Ashworth Sep 26 '23 at 11:40