In a daily I read (name has been changed):
Mr X takes a holiday with his divorced wife and daughter.
Is this correct? Here, doesn't divorced qualify both wife and daughter here?
In a daily I read (name has been changed):
Mr X takes a holiday with his divorced wife and daughter.
Is this correct? Here, doesn't divorced qualify both wife and daughter here?
Possibly it could qualify both, if we were saying Mr X takes a holdiday with his divorced wife, and his daughter who is also divorced (as opposed to some other daughter). But one wouldn't normally mean that by the phrase.
Another objection would be that Mr X couldn't take a holiday with his divorced wife, as if he is divorced from her, she isn't his wife. It could, at a pinch, mean he is taking a holiday with his wife who is divorced from someone else, as opposed to a different wife, if he had more than one.
This is a horrible sentence really.
"Mr X takes a holiday with his divorced wife and daughter."
It has so many possible meanings, none of which are well stated.
"Mr. X takes a holiday with his ex-wife and their daughter"
"Mr. X takes a holiday with his wife and daughter, both themselves divorcees"
"Mr X takes a holiday with his wife, a divorcee, and their daughter"
"Mr X takes a holiday with his wife, a divorcee, and her daughter"
and I'm sure even more oblique versions are possible.