10

Possible Duplicate:
Plural/singular verb agreement with units
Does modifying a collective noun with a number make the subject plural?

Can anyone help me determine the correct verb in this sentence? I am not sure what to do. If it were not such a complex introductory phrase, it would be more obvious. The general consensus of my friends who are not professional writers is that the verb should be are.

To me the question is whether or not the subject is singular (i.e., “a large collective volume of paint”, perhaps in a tank) or plural (a lot of the individual gallon containers of paint).

If simplified to other options, it would be like these:

  1. Paint is sold.
  2. Gallons of paint are sold.
  3. More paint is sold.
  4. More gallons of paint are sold.
  5. More than 1000 gallons of paint is sold. [emphasis on total volume]
  6. More than 1000 gallons of paint are sold. [emphasis on individual containers]
Paul
  • 117

5 Answers5

6

Your friends are right. The verb should be are.

This is because the sentence is about gallons of paint, and there are 1,000 of them. Emphasis on total volume or individual containers doesn't come into it.

Compare with

A 1,000-gallon quantity of paint is sold everyday.

Here, the sentence is about a quantity of paint, and there is only one quantity so the verb should be is. Whether that quantity is a 1,000 gallon tank or 1,000 one-gallon cans makes no difference.

Roaring Fish
  • 15,115
  • What if the whole paragraph were "We sell over 200 of those 5 gallon cans of paint every day in the week. More than 1000 gallons is sold each day!" – bib Sep 06 '12 at 16:42
  • 2
    Ten miles is/are too long to hike with a broken ankle? – Peter Shor Sep 07 '12 at 02:29
5

The subject of this sentence is more used as a pronoun.

a greater or additional amount or degree:

tell me more

they proved more of a hindrance than a help

As a pronoun, more has a collective quality. In some cases, a singular is probably mandatory

More than this quantity of 1000 gallons, is needed. [quantity conveys a singular amount]

In other cases, the plural form is probably needed

More than these 1000 gallon cans are needed. [these emphasizes the plural quality]

The term gallons is not the subject of the sentence but a modifier (quantifier) of more. While gallons plural nature may incline one toward a plural verb, as has been pointed out in comments (see tchrist above), a numerical term in front of a noun does not necessarily eliminate a collective singular sense. See also this discussion of dozen.

bib
  • 72,782
  • 2
    Would you say "More than 1,000 bottles of beer is sold each day", on the basis that "1,000 bottles" is just a modifier of 'beer'? Ask yourself what is being sold - it isn't 'more'! 'Bottles of beer' or 'gallons of paint' is what is being sold, and they are both partitive and the subjects of the verb, with the '1,000' is the the quantifier of those partitives. – Roaring Fish Sep 06 '12 at 14:45
  • @RoaringFish I agree that more without more is not very informative. But we often have subjects of sentences that need modification before they mean much. Gallons are both a unit of delivery (one gallon can) and a measure of amount of a non-unitary liquid (multi-gallon tankful). "Bottles" are different. Without reference to actual volume, the unit, bottle, is all you are discussing. I have no problem treating more than 1000 gallons as a plural concept unless context demands otherwise. More than 1000 gallons were sold yesterday. Tomorrow more is needed. What would you call more? – bib Sep 06 '12 at 15:03
  • 2
    +1, as I agree to your point that the singularity/plurality depends on the context. But I would point out that the role of the word gallons in fact depends on that context: It's either a modifier of more, or it is a noun, the subject of the sentence. – Bob Sep 06 '12 at 15:14
  • +1. Like Bob, I agree that singularity/plurality depends on the context. I think the real determinant of context is the verb sold. Paint is sold individual gallon packages, so the action is a repeated (plural) one. Contrast with this sentence: More than 1000 gallons of water is pumped daily to irrigate this field. – Steven Rumbalski Sep 06 '12 at 17:37
4

I would go for "is" instead of "are".

The word "paint" is a singulare tantum and a mass noun, which is a word only existing in the singular form used to describe a mass of something uncountable. In English, words describing liquids (water, paint), gases (air), powders (flour) and some materials (wood) are such words usually only used in the singular form, unless you refer to two different types of something, e.g.: Which of these paints do you prefer?

In your sentence, "gallon" is a measure word and not the subject, which grammatical number defines the correct verb form (is/are). "More than 1000 gallons" is a quantifier, which specifies the amount of paint and not the number of paint(s).

So, paint is still singular and it is IMHO more correct to use the verb form "is".

jarnbjo
  • 147
2

Unless you have a specialized context, the subject is plural, since the gallons (think cans) of paint are what’s being sold. The only way I could see:

More than 1000 gallons of paint is sold

is to say:

**For the main (paint manufacturing) plant, **more than 1000 gallons of paint is sold each day .

Or something like that, but even then it would be a close call, because paint is almost always sold as individual objects, cans of paint. So I’d go with are.

Bob
  • 2,440
2

The correct usage has to be: More than 1000 gallons of paint is sold each day.

What is worth noting in this context is that there is a reference to a large volume of a single "item" i.e. paint. So, the quantification for the connective will be paint

The consideration of the case 1000 cans makes it a statement referring 1000 individual items, which in this case are cans.

Karan P
  • 119