Questions tagged [wittgenstein]

Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein (1889 – 1951) was an Austrian-British philosopher, professor in philosophy at the University of Cambridge (1939-1947). He worked in foundations of mathematics and on mathematical logic, the philosophy of mind, and the philosophy of language. He played a central, if controversial, role in 20th-century analytic philosophy.

Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein (1889–1951) was an Austrian-British philosopher, professor in philosophy at the University of Cambridge (1939-1947). His work, technically separated into three periods but generally divided into the 'early' and the 'later' Wittgenstein, was primarily focused on the philosophy of mathematics and the philosophy of language.

Originally a student of engineering, Wittgenstein always had a keen interest in mathematics and was keen on the idea of designing and flying aeroplanes. After receiving a diploma in engineering he encountered the works of Bertrand Russell and Gottlob Frege on the foundations of mathematics and became deeply intrigued in formal logic, visiting Frege who in turn recommended he go to Cambridge to study under Russell. Wittgenstein would become Russell's fiercest pupil, seeking to challenge the logician at every opportunity.

Initially a collaborator in the logical atomist movement pioneered by Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell, Wittgenstein's concern for the limitations of language led him to became one of the movement's critics, before Gödel formally proved the futility of the logical atomist project. Wittgenstein's first work, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, explores the limitations of the logical atomist project and of philosophy itself, though rooting his thesis in formal logic and the propositional approach to philosophy and knowledge. One of the most significant ideas in the Tractatus is the distinction between what can be said and what can be shown, an idea that is surely rooted in his conception of mathematics as a language with only a syntax and no semantics or factual reference, and thus as a language which can be grasped through its syntax alone and can only generate rules. Ironically, the Tractatus was somewhat misunderstood by the logical positivists of the Vienna Circle, who basically sought to weaponise its concluding statement:

7. Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.

against metaphysics, in a bid to silence the obscure, unscientific and often verbose continental philosophers with whom their movement took issue.

Frustrated with the lack of understanding he received from his contemporaries and the futility of even his own work, Wittgenstein focused on lecturing and his ideas about the foundations of mathematics would change dramatically. Technically this would be his 'middle' period but because he essentially instructed, and concerned himself with, the foundations of mathematics during this period, and because many of his philosophical views would later be compiled in his Philosophical Investigations after his death, this period tends to be overlooked by philosophical academics. His middle period is best captured in a collection of his lectures on the foundations of mathematics, which are demonstrative of his shift from logical atomism and his lofty ambitions to complete Russell's Principia Mathematica to a sceptical finitism.

War played an odd role in Wittgenstein's life. During the first world war, Wittgenstein composed his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus and afterwards became the foremost philosopher of his time, while during the second he become very critical of philosophy and withdrew from academia, working as a nameless assistant in a hospital. Eventually he would return to philosophy, though he resigned from lecturing to focus on writing two texts that would come to influence a generation of analytic philosophers and would remain of significant interest up to the present day: the Philosophical Investigations and On Certainty.

These books represent the culmination of Wittgenstein's later period, and while the controversy surrounding the Tractatus was significant, it is this later work for which Wittgenstein is best remembered and in which he contributed some of his most significant insights. Though Wittgenstein was always a distinct character in philosophy, during this later period Wittgenstein is unique among his contemporaries in analytic philosophy for taking a somewhat more continental approach to philosophy.

In the Philosophical Investigations, Wittgenstein updates his original views about meaning from a static, pointing system of simple names and composites referring directly to facts, to a dynamic and mutating grammar that comprises life and situations as its metalanguage. He described these situations as forms of life or language-games that embody a rudimentary language that our actual language comes to represent through rule-following or a natural grasp of the abstract 'game' in a given form of life.

Wittgenstein not only resembled continental philosophy in his move away from formalisation, however. He was always cautious—or at least reticent—about the subject/object distinction, a central dogma of the Cartesian tradition that his contemporaries were all too ready to affirm. He avoided speaking about a distinct and foundational I or a cogito except for illustrative purposes. His emphasis fell rather on the facts themselves, the experience, the behaviour of people and the world in what he called 'forms of life' or 'language-games'. Even in his early work, which can be interpreted prima facie as a potential weapon against continental schools of thought, Wittgenstein rather described and visualised the experience, the nature of reality as pictures that are not absolutely distinct from the observer, the observer ever a part of the world and necessarily limited by its bounds.

For Wittgenstein, language was not simply descriptive, it embodied human experience and much of his later work can be said to be a phenomenological project. Seldom will you find a philosopher who is interested in the philosophy of mind/phenomenology who is not at least familiar with Wittgenstein's later ideas.

273 questions
11
votes
4 answers

Are there any true Wittgensteinians?

[CRUCIAL CLARIFICATION: unless I explicitly say otherwise, all references to Wittgenstein, or W, below should be read as "the post-Tractatus Wittgenstein." I am not interested in those who could be described as followers of the author of the…
kjo
  • 578
  • 3
  • 12
9
votes
3 answers

What does Wittgenstein mean by "grammatical jokes"?

In §111 of his Philosophical Investigation, Ludwig Wittgenstein writes (my hopefully not-too-inept translation1): Let’s ask ourselves: why do we perceive a grammatical joke as deep? (And that is what philosophical depth is.) I would have guessed…
kjo
  • 578
  • 3
  • 12
8
votes
1 answer

One or two Wittgensteins?

It is common opinion that Wittgenstein has two main different periods which are best exemplified by the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus and the Philosophical Investigations and that these periods are highly contradictory. I remember however that a…
Mauricio Tec
  • 183
  • 6
8
votes
5 answers

Can someone explain this Wittgenstein joke?

Schoolmaster: Suppose x is the number of sheep in this problem Pupil: But, Sir, suppose x is not the number of sheep (I asked professor Wittgenstein if this is not a profound philosophical joke, and he said it was.)
EnriqueC
  • 89
  • 2
8
votes
3 answers

Did Wittgenstein think that pure description, without the influence of explanation, could be pursued?

Wittgenstein is stated as having said "we must do away with the explanation and description alone must take its place" (PI 109). But isn't this akin to the myth of the given that Sellars attacked? Can a clear distinction really be made between…
Mos
  • 755
  • 4
  • 13
4
votes
3 answers

Why does Wittgenstein think there are no genuine philosophical questions?

According to the movie I didn't get the part: https://youtu.be/r0cN_bpLrxk?t=201 "there are linguistic, ethical, logistic and religious but there are no genuine philosophical problems [...] philosophy is just byproduct of misunderstanding the…
VostanMinor
  • 129
  • 1
  • 8
4
votes
1 answer

What are the differences between facts and things?

I have just started reading Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus and at the start I already don't understand his claim. He said that the world is the totality of facts and not of things. I am totally clueless what he means by that and it…
3
votes
1 answer

What motivates Wittgenstein’s declaration of the world as the totality of facts?

From the Tractatus: The world is everything that is the case. I understand “the case” to merely be an informal way of saying “that which is true”. 1.1 The world is the totality of facts, not of things. I am curious if Wittgenstein is refuting…
Julius Hamilton
  • 1,559
  • 4
  • 29
3
votes
2 answers

Does the second Wittgenstein still consider philosophical questions to be meaningless?

In his logico-philosophical treatise, if I have understood correctly, Wittgenstein proposes a demonstration of the fact that philosophical questions are not real problems but the result of misunderstandings in language. Does the so-called "second…
user49505
3
votes
2 answers

For Wittgenstein in Philosophical Investigations, is all use of language in a language game?

If so, doesn't this characterize language as being within a language game, thus undermining Wittgenstein's anti-essentialism?
calling
  • 31
  • 2
3
votes
2 answers

Why the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus was/is so groundbreaking?

I am reading the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (of L. Wittgenstein) these days along with The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. The Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus is a very difficult work to read first of all because it is too short for the…
Outcast
  • 158
  • 7
3
votes
1 answer

Tractatus 3.3421, possibility

Tractatus 3.3421 runs: "A particular method of symbolizing may be unimportant, but it is always important that this is a possible method of symbolizing. And this happens as a rule in philosophy: The single thing proves over and over again to be…
3
votes
1 answer

Relationship between Kant and Wittgenstein

Anyone run into a good book or essay relating (discussing the arguable relationship between) Kant's embedding our 'conceptual scheme' (for lack of a better term for "the way we think", or what we presuppose in describing/explaining reality) in pure…
gonzo
  • 1,865
  • 10
  • 12
3
votes
1 answer

The preface of Wittgenstein's Tractatus

The Preface to the Tractatus begins: This book will perhaps only be understood by those who have themselves already thought the thoughts which are expressed in it—or similar thoughts The poet Denise Levertov draws from a statement by Ibsen in…
user6917
3
votes
3 answers

What can we speak of

Wittgenstein's Tractatus starts with the assumption that the world is "the totality of... facts". But famously concludes that what we cannot speak of "one must be silent" about. It seems pretty clear that he's not saying that we mustn't ever talk…
user6917
1
2 3