The dialect is American English, but I'd be interested to know if this varies between dialects. Is it"togglable" or "toggleable"? Because neither dictionary.com, webster.com, nor Outlook's spelling suggestions/checker tend to have any record of this word. I have a hard time believing it's not a word in proper English though, and I would be tempted to think its spelling is "toggleable".
Asked
Active
Viewed 6.1k times
42
-
4Google's book search reveals 300 results for "toggleable" and 45 results for "togglable". Not a lot of traction on either word, but "toggleable" is more popular. – Ian MacDonald Mar 10 '15 at 13:30
-
Why don't you believe it's not a word? Generally you would use "two-state widget" or "widget that can be toggled". – Kevin Workman Mar 10 '15 at 13:33
-
@KevinWorkman It seems to me like it makes too much sense for it to not be a word, even if it hasn't caught the attention of all the academic institutions yet. – Panzercrisis Mar 10 '15 at 13:38
-
@Panzercrisis I'm not sure that's enough to consider something a word, but you might want to check out the answers (especially snailboat's answer) to this question: http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/132535/to-be-able-to-toggle-something – Kevin Workman Mar 10 '15 at 13:56
-
8Syntactically and orthographically, *to toggle* is much the same as *to handle, where Google NGram makes it pretty obvious most people still retain the 'e' in 'handleable'. Contrast with sizable/sizeable, where most people have discarded the 'e', and lovable/loveable, where practically everyone* has discarded it. Me, I'm just hopelessly inconsistent. – FumbleFingers Mar 10 '15 at 13:58
-
4Related, possible duplicates: Rules for removing last vowel when adding “-able”?, When to drop the 'e' when ending in -able? – choster Mar 10 '15 at 15:54
-
The issue of whether to drop the "excess" vowel in a word like "toggleable" is a long-standing one. There are "rules", but they generally come with long lists of exceptions. – Hot Licks Mar 10 '15 at 19:41
-
Google web results (toggleable:284k, togglable:321k) reinforce @IanMacDonald's cited Google Books Ngrams tallies, though I get "Ngrams not found: toggleable, togglable" when I try. – Adam Katz Jun 06 '16 at 22:57
-
related: Are you googlable? – Mari-Lou A Feb 21 '17 at 19:57
-
1@Kevin: Any word + valid affix = word. It's called "productive morphology." – Ben Oct 25 '19 at 17:15
-
@Ben As has been mentioned here before, productivity is gradeable in English. – Edwin Ashworth Oct 25 '19 at 18:09
1 Answers
31
It's not a word, so it has no formal spelling as of now. The English language's main strength is its adaptability, so one day it will most likely be officially accepted as a word, but for now, it has no defined spelling.
I would personally keep the e, as there are 3 consonants before it, and that makes me want to balance the scales a bit, and that's how it works in some others with the same scenario, like settleable, whistleable, and handleable.
friff14
- 450
-
23Why do you say it's not a word? Just because it's not in a dictionary? If you're waiting for it to be "officially accepted as a word", you'll be waiting a long time, since there is no official organization with the power to do so. Anyway, I agree with the spelling suggested here. – herisson Mar 10 '15 at 16:59
-
3Good point, I'm going with a technical not-a-word thing. There aren't any official organizations that represent the English language, sure, but Merriam-Webster qualifies in my eyes. Once they add a word, I consider it "official." – friff14 Mar 10 '15 at 17:06
-
4What about when it gets added to wiktionary? Or when it shows up > 500k times in Google? There simply is no "official" recognition of words in English, and arguably if two people use it and understand each other, it's already a word. – treeface Sep 12 '17 at 20:43
-
1@friff14: "...a technical not-a-word thing..." Again: There is no such thing, for English. If there were, it certainly wouldn't be Merriam-Webster; the OED, more likely. But they are clear their role (indeed, the role of English dictionaries in general) is descriptive, not prescriptive. – T.J. Crowder Mar 28 '18 at 14:49
-
I know this discussion is quite stale, but I've been saying for many years that "Common usage is correct usage" (in absence of a named style guide). If people readily understand toggleable to mean "something with two states that will transition back and forth between those states upon a discrete action" then it's a word. As far as leaving the 'e', I'd say it stays because the pronunciation in practice as far as I've heard is ˈtɒgələbəl not ˈtɒglɑːbəl (Tog-uhl-uh-bull not Tog-la-bull) contrast lovable where the v blends into the able. – Patrick Oct 20 '22 at 13:20
-
Is it still not a word? Any idea when it will be added to dictionaries or started being considered as a word? I think it's used quite often in context of different togglable settings or video games' related things, like abilities, recently even more. – Kusavil Feb 08 '24 at 18:10