0

When using quotes in academic articles there is often a need to simplify things, without being accused of manipulating the original meaning. Consider the paragraph below in Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations:

The natural effort of every individual to better his own condition, when suffered to exert itself with freedom and security, is so powerful a principle, that it is alone, and without any assistance, not only capable of carrying on the society to wealth and prosperity, but of surmounting a hundred impertinent obstructions, with which the folly of human laws too often encumbers its operations

I want to use

The natural effort of every individual to better his own condition, when suffered to exert itself with freedom and security, is so powerful a principle, that it is alone, and without any assistance, ... capable of carrying on the society to wealth and prosperity.

I think it is fair enough because the original phrase could also be rewritten as this:

The natural effort of every individual to better his own condition, when suffered to exert itself with freedom and security, is so powerful a principle, that it is alone, and without any assistance, capable of carrying on the society to wealth and prosperity. Such effort is also capable of surmounting a hundred impertinent obstructions, with which the folly of human laws too often encumbers its operations.

What would convention dictate? Is mine a misquotation?

luchonacho
  • 2,201
  • The use of ellipses is one of the few exceptions to the need for a verbatim quotation. They indicate that you have deliberately omitted material. If you want to make it explicit that it's you using them, you can introduce the quotation with something like (ellipsis mine), in the case of a single ellipsis, to make it clear that it's not a verbatim quote of the author's use of ellipses. – Jason Bassford May 07 '20 at 23:28
  • You’re leaving out the point that this is the case but (except for) the obstacles placed in the way by the government. – Xanne May 08 '20 at 00:39
  • @Xanne I don't think "but" means "except" here; it indicates a contrast with "only". – Andreas Blass May 08 '20 at 02:36
  • @AndreasBlass Right you are. The truncated version still leaves out this important point. – Xanne May 08 '20 at 03:44

0 Answers0