Its kinda confusing but I will explain. I saw a term a while ago that explained how people can disagree with another. Instead of disagreeing because they do not like their opinion, the person will disagree because they dont like someone or something that also likes the opinion.
Example: Person A thinks that driving on the road should require a license.
Person B disagrees because a politician Person B doesn't like agrees with Person A, so Person B decides to disagree.
You see that the argument Person A gave is reasonable, and Person B would completely agree, but the problem is that because someone Person B doesn't like agrees with Person A, they decide to disagree.
This example is something very popular in politics (ex; only voting for a single political party, instead of voting depending on the politician's opinion). Another thing its similar to is contrarianism. You are disagreeing based not on the logic, but for another reason.
An association fallacy is an informal inductive fallacy of the hasty-generalization or red-herring type and which asserts, by irrelevant association and often by appeal to emotion, that qualities of one thing[/person/idea] are inherently qualities of another [somehow related person, belief etc] when the connection may in fact be irrelevant as regards the qualities concerned].
– Edwin Ashworth Jul 30 '23 at 14:01