Questions tagged [logical-positivism]

The philosophical view that only statements verifiable either logically or empirically would be cognitively meaningful.

The philosophical view that only statements verifiable either logically or empirically would be cognitively meaningful.

Concerning reality, the necessary is a state true in all possible worlds—mere logical validity—whereas the contingent hinges on the way the particular world is. Concerning knowledge, the a priori is knowable before or without, whereas the a posteriori is knowable only after or through, relevant experience. Concerning statements, the analytic is true via terms' arrangement and meanings, thus a tautology—true by logical necessity but uninformative about the world—whereas the synthetic adds reference to a state of facts, a contingency.

79 questions
29
votes
3 answers

What are/were the main criticisms of logical positivism?

Logical positivism, later called logical empiricism, was a school of analytic philosophy famously connected with the Vienna circle and with a significant following up until the 1950's. What were the main criticisms that were articulated to refute…
eMansipater
  • 1,520
  • 2
  • 15
  • 19
6
votes
1 answer

To what extent did the logical positivists actually reject traditional philosophy?

Logical positivism is often taught as one of the three new schools of philosophy, together with pragmatism and phenomenology, that went against traditional philosophy in a radical manner. While I am certainly not disputing that rejecting metaphysics…
Ben
  • 2,376
  • 1
  • 19
  • 32
3
votes
1 answer

Why did the logical positivists “reject metaphysics”?

True, my question is roughly identical to this one Did early analytic philosophers reject metaphysics? , yet I don’t find the answers fulfilling. I have done some light reading on logical empiricism. It is said that they condoned only two forms of…
Julius Hamilton
  • 1,559
  • 4
  • 29